Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why would anyone, who is not a plutocrat, want to settle for a trickle?

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in 1936, paraphrased the republican argument against him in his reelection bid, when he mocked the republicans with the following one minute section of his speech.

“Let me warn you! Let me warn America! Of course we believe in social security. We believe in jobs for the unemployed. We believe in saving people’s homes! Cross our hearts and hope to die, we believe in all these things! But, we do not like the way the present administration is doing them. Just turn them over to us! We will do all of them! We will do more of them! We will do them better, and most important of all, the doing of them will not cost anybody anything."

www. youtube.com/watch?v=SUZGkNAUSvY

Now, 76 years later, the Guardians of Plutocracy (GOP) are singing the same old song. So, if you are willing to settle for a trickle, vote for Romney; he will thank you for the tax cut for the wealthy.

.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    In the debate Mitt reversed his position on tax breaks for the rich, because he knew that was his turd in the punch bowl that could have cost him votes.But everyone knows if elected that turd will surely float back to the top of the bowl.Mitt stated in September that he would replace the caps that Obamacare had removed that limits the number of operations that the insurance would cover.witch would mean if your child needed another operation to save their life,but had already had their limit it would not be covered.If you could not afford it, your child may perish.When Mitt was ask why he would restore those caps,Mitt said they are costing our insurance industry to much money.Why would anyone want a president that would always put profits first over life.If Mitt was elected, and he cut our wages and benefits in half so industries could hire twice the employees for the same money he would look at that as a success.Mitt Romney is the south end of a north bound horse and if elected president America will find that out.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Why do you think Romney's cutting school funding on day 1?

    Cause only dummies vote republican!

    DEMOCRAT'S across the board! Maybe we can get stuff done then.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    they just want slaves basically.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.