When Will the 2nd Civil War Start in the USA war of the Poor vs the Rich?

No. anytime protests attain into the tens of millions or turn violent, between both important activities champions the protestors' calls for and co-opts their move. It has surpassed off with the exertions move of the Eighteen Eighties, the yank Socialist move of 1912, the anti-immigration move of 1924, the Civil Rights move of the Nineteen Fifties and the anti-Vietnam conflict move of the Sixties, to boot as others. the position is Ross Perot's party today? The Civil conflict became an anomaly, because the alterations were strictly interior sight. Egypt is way less good because they have really one important city and in case you seize the Presidential Palace in Cairo, you've captured Egypt. u.s. is form of a nicely regulated stress cooker with an electoral device that shall we steam get away, besides the undeniable fact that the Egyptian dictatorship, no count number how benign, is form of a sealed stress cooker and in case you won't be able to turn off the nice and cozy temperature, it is going to ultimately explode. If all the yank properly and left or poor or wealthy lived in distinct areas, and there have been no loose elections, we would have a issue.

No, Obama is already starting the war of the Richpoor class against the Middle class.

And you sound like one of his shills.

The rich have purchased the votes of the poor with government handouts. Remember the free cell phones lady?

The rich and poor have joined forces against the middle as the Richpoor class.

Meanwhile, government policy has spent 50 years using poor women as baby factories to flood the country with poor people. Now the Richpoor class vastly outnumbers the middle class.

The welfare baby generations will become soldiers in the Richpoor army, sent out to do battle against the middle class.

That will be the next civil war.

That is a really absurd question/rant. Most people don't stay in one class forever. People who start out as "poor" eventually move out of that class and move upward. Most people wish to move upward and have more income.

If you wish to remain poor and inarticulate and without the ability to even write a grammatical sentence-so be it. People aren't desirous of killing their hardworking neighbors who might make more money because they worked hard. And if someone was handed money down from their parents- so be it. What business is it of yours?.

Maybe pay more attention to educating yourself and you too can eventually make more money and won't have to spend so much time worrying over the "rich."

Rich people may be baronous slobs, but they have money, and the constitution says they have a right to it. And you know why union members join unions? So they can become richer. You think 95% of people who agree with you would still agree if they won the lottery? Classes have purposes. Upper class wants to stay there, middle class wants to reach the top, and lower class wants everything equal until they become rich. It is a chain.

Well, the French Revolution started when enough people were starving and watching the aristocracy living high off the hog. Expect it when most people are poor and only a few are super wealthy. If we don't stop the Republicans from gutting unions and protecting corporations instead of people, it won't take long.

47 % of americans have been pushed over the fiscal cliff already into poverty . since 2001 we have seen the largest redistribution of wealth in human history , from the middle class working man , up to the top few percent richest .

a paradigm shift is coming soon .

Like the French Revolution?

First, if that does happen, Obama will be to blame for starting the war. Second, I don't see it happening between rich and poor but between liberals who have no common sense and are destroying this country because of, for example, their jealousy of the success of the rich--and the rest of us.

and every day, they're making more poor people with layoffs and cuts, sending folks to china...

in 10 years it will be the 80 vs. the 20...

this would be rather comical...because the poor seem to support politiicians who support the rich, thile the rich support politicians who support the poor