Are these stories true about supreme court of California questioning Obama's eligibility for office?

No. A disbarred, Russian nutcase birther called Orly Taitz is "questioning" it. She's been laughed out of 6 courts, last time I checked, and fined for frivolous lawsuits. I'm not sure what kind of mental defect she has, but she's surely not sane.

The question is from 2012, and of course, the California Supreme Court rejected Noonan's petition. Noonan is back again in 2014 with another petition to the California Supreme Court on Obama eligibility, but it's the same stuff as all the rest of the pile of failed birther lawsuits (226 of them at last count).

Only those who have had their head in the sand the last 4 years do not know that there have been multiple cases of Obama's eligibility brought to court. The fact is Obama has not proven he is eligible.

Even the DNC knows it and modified their 2008 document of nomination to the States to have Obama and Biden on the ballot. They took out the line 'and certify that the below named are constitutionally eligible to serve...'

The Fed Govt is a sham. Most of the S.C. judges know Obama isn't eligible, but they won't bite the hand that feeds them.

The California Supreme Court isn't questioning Obama's eligibility for office, you nitwit, a birther petitioner is. Trust me, there is a difference.

No. All it is is someone trying to get the court to listen to their "new credible evidence. Try Dononfrio V Mary wells.New Jersey case that made it to the supreme court.