Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
The Big Bang vs. Creationism?
The Big Bang theory states that the universe was once a tiny, compact ball that was smaller than an atom. Suddenly, it "burst" outward in an "explosion," which can be compared to the inflation of a balloon. According to cosmologists, the universe is still expanding today. No one can explain what caused the speck to come into existence (or if you want to argue the speck created existence, how did the speck come from absolutely nothing?). Some scientists have thrown around the idea that there was some type of "matter," but the Big Bang was supposed to have created matter.
Creationism is the belief that the universe is God's creation. According to Christianity, God is the alpha and the omega, the beginning and the end. By merely saying "let there be light," all of existence was illuminated. Religion is based on faith, which is a belief in something that doesn't have much of any proof.
The reason I have created this "question," which is really more of an informative post, is because I want the atheists here to stop mocking the Christians and other religious people. The "what created God" argument can be used for "what created the speck;" no one knows. The only thing that is for certain is that, according to creationism, God has always existed/been before existence. The only reason the Big Bang Theory is even plausible is because cosmologists think they've found evidence that the universe is expanding.
The bottom line is: Stop calling theists idiots. Atheists do not know where the speck came from in the Big Bang, and you can't prove religion because it's completely based on faith. My faith in God is from an intellectual standpoint; Christianity just seems so much more plausible. Feel free to post your thoughts, but keep it clean and ad hominem free.
Science constantly changes itself, but religion remains the same. As I said, the only reason scientists even consider the possibility of the big bang is the expansion of the universe that is going on today. If they are wrong, then the Big Bang theory means nothing.
Resorting to calling God a space wizard and using roundabout arguments again, are we?
9 Answers
- godlessLv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
If we tell you, will you quit believing in your invisible cosmic magic man? I doubt it.
For thousands of years, people have said that their gods were behind what they didn't understand -- life, lightning, stars, earthquakes, the origin of life, the world or the universe, etc. Positing a god to supposedly answer a question solves nothing. It just adds an unwarranted level of complexity and stops you from asking more questions.
It used to be that science couldn't answer the question about the origin of the universe or of the Big Bang, but that didn't mean we should make up an answer (such as a god) and say that it was the cause. Within the last few decades scientists have discovered some good answers. Of course, a scientific explanation is more complex than simply saying, "God did it."
Quantum mechanics shows that "nothing," as a philosophical concept, does not exist. There is always a quantum field with random fluctuations.
There are many well-respected physicists, such as Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Sean M. Carroll, Victor Stenger, Michio Kaku, Alan Guth, Alex Vilenkin, Robert A.J. Matthews, and Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, who have created scientific models where the Big Bang and thus the entire universe could arise from nothing but a random quantum vacuum fluctuation in the quantum field -- via natural processes.
In relativity, gravity is negative energy, and matter and photons are positive energy. Because negative and positive energy seem to be equal in absolute total value, our observable universe appears balanced to the sum of zero. Our universe could thus have come into existence without violating conservation of mass and energy — with the matter of the universe condensing out of the positive energy as the universe cooled, and gravity created from the negative energy.
I know that this doesn't make sense in our Newtonian experience, but it does in the realm of quantum mechanics and relativity. As Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman wrote, "The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as she is — absurd."
For more about the Big Bang and its implications, watch the video at the 1st link - "A Universe From Nothing" by theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, read an interview with him (at the 2nd link), get his new book (at the 3rd link), or read an excerpt from his book (at the 4th link). And, see the 5th link for "Quantum scientists make something out of nothing."
-
Source(s): http://tinyurl.com/y8j6tpa http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/everything-and-... http://www.amazon.com/Universe-Nothing-There-Somet... http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=u... http://tinyurl.com/agfvch8 http://www.godlessgeeks.com/WhyAtheism.htm#bigbang http://www.stellarhousepublishing.com/originsofchr... http://freethoughtblogs.com/wwjtd/2012/01/19/will-... http://www.atheismresource.com/2010/jesus-never-ex... http://www.godlessgeeks.com/JesusExist.htm - auskiwi101Lv 78 years ago
Bottom line. Your faith is a delusional standpoint.
At no stage will an always existed invisible sky wizard be an acceptable answer for a thinking person
Additional Details
It was SKY wizard. :)
It not a roundabout argument you hypocrite, the burden of proof is on you but you have nothing so you run from it like the coward you are
- 8 years ago
There is evidence for the big bang. There is no evidence any gods exist, let alone a specific one.
>Stop calling theists idiots.
Stop arguing logical fallacies like appeal to ignorance.
>you can't prove religion because it's completely based on faith
That means you have no intellectually honest reason to believe in that specific god.
- Anonymous8 years ago
The Big Bang may be wrong....but at least, and you admit this, there is at least some scientific evidence to support it.......
For God and Creationism there isn't a single scrap of evidence to back it up.........
Science is dynamic and changes as more knowledge is gained.......
Religion is static.....no knowledge is ever gained....
Theists are idiots....there is no more reason to believe in God as there is to believe in Father Christmas......adults believing in fairy tales is ridiculous....
- ?Lv 68 years ago
Yes, nobody knows the full truth about the beginning of the universe. Let's agree on that instead of believing in and promoting one of many ancient myths which claim to explain it. Because bronze age man was good at making up stories. (Homer and his ilk were much better at it than the Abrahamic lot - let's face it.) But they weren't so good at cosmology and particle physics.
- ?Lv 78 years ago
If "no one knows", then it's a gap. There is no reason to stick a god in it!
I don't know where one of my left socks is. Do you know? Does anyone know? If NO ONE knows, is it reasonable to believe that a GOD stole my left sock for unknown reasons, since gods work in mysterious ways and shouldn't be questioned?
If it is, can you help me with somehow convincing him to give it back?
- Anonymous8 years ago
We don't know how the universe came into being. Therefore God did it or even more egregious is that the Christian god did it.
NON- SEQUITUR
- 8 years ago
How can Christianity seem much more plausible than evolution and fact. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CHRISTIANITY. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK OF CONTRADICTIONS AND MORAL LOOPHOLES.