Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

For all the people who say millions have been...?

Killed in the name of atheism I want you to prove it and link me to someone who has killed in the name of atheism. And it has to be specifically for atheism. Stalin may of been atheist but he didn't kill in the name of atheism. Anyway have fun finding proof.

Update:

@scooterpoop in another question you aske why millions have been killed in the name of atheism. If you can't back up your claim with people who have killed specifically for atheism then why did you say it?

Update 2:

@scooterpoop in another question you aske why millions have been killed in the name of atheism. If you can't back up your claim with people who have killed specifically for atheism then why did you say it?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 6
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    It's called 'State Atheism' look it up. It's when the government Promotes atheism and persecutes and kills the religious.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    Even if an atheist goes and kills someone in the name of atheism no atheists would pay any serious attention to it. With atheism, you can group up with other atheists, but if a random atheist does something stupid, you don't have to share in the blame or make excuses for him.

    Source(s): Perk.
  • 8 years ago

    Oblivion Approaches, if you're comparing rape to disbelief and doubt, you have some very serious issues. Nevertheless, there is more proof that rape has caused murder. Nobody kills in the name of atheism. That's a moronic notion to begin with.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    8 years ago

    The Khmer Rouge, (Khmer: ខ្មែរក្រហម Khmer Krahom) literally translated as Red Khmers, was the name given to the followers of the Communist Party of Kampuchea in Cambodia. It was formed in 1968 as an offshoot of the Vietnam People's Army from North Vietnam. It was the ruling party in Cambodia from 1975 to 1979, led by Pol Pot, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Son Sen, and Khieu Samphan. Democratic Kampuchea was the name of the state as controlled by the government of the Khmer Rouge from 1975 to 1979.

    This organization is remembered primarily for its policy of social engineering, which resulted in genocide.[1] Its attempts at agricultural reform led to widespread famine, while its insistence on absolute self-sufficiency, even in the supply of medicine, led to the deaths of thousands from treatable diseases such as malaria. Arbitrary executions and torture carried out by its cadres against perceived subversive elements, or during purges of its own ranks between 1975 and 1978, are considered to have constituted genocide.[2]

    Source(s): It's like saying prove to me that anyone has killed in the name of rape. No? Therefore rapists are good.
  • 8 years ago

    Stalin killed in the name of creating an oppressive godless strangle state. Why can't you accept that when you want me to be ashamed of myself for the crusades and inquisition and witch trails none of which I had anything to do with?

  • 8 years ago

    "killed in the name of" implies that it was done under (not for) that religious philosophy. I am sure the irrelevence of life is perhaps a docrine that led into this sort of behavior.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    settle down my friend. we all know religon has abused and killed multi millions. they are just trying to justify theire idology.

  • 8 years ago

    Violence on an apocalyptic scale is a creation of faith. Reason, by its nature, disarms senseless cruelty. Faith seeks to justify it.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    8 years ago

    Good question.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Not necessary.

    Everyone knows the history of communism.

    Ask the Falun Gong about religious oppression in China.

    **************

    I'm not backing up anything.

    If you can't learn only 100 years of recent history, there's something wrong with you.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.