If US can attack any country in the name of establishing Democracy (which their defined version of goverment),?

Would you rather a conqueror give you human rights? Or take them away?

Even I (who served in the military) do not think we have a right to invade who we want, but we grant equality, you grant subjugation.

Here's a fun fact: The US has given more humaitarian aid to other contries in 230 years than all other countries combined. Let me know when you catch up.

You don't know the violent Muslim history?

Why do they keep you ready to kill and ignorant?

***Befitting an empire that had been founded and extended to spread Islam

through the waging of the jihad, or holy war, military leaders played a

dominant role in the Ottoman state and the economy of the empire was geared to

warfare and expansion. The Turkic cavalrymen, who were chiefly responsible for

the Ottomans' early conquests from the 13th to the 16th centuries, gradually

developed into a warrior aristocracy. *** http://history-world.org/ottoman%20empire.htm

In other words, the Ottoman empire was at war for 400 years. But it wasn't to establish Sharia. It was to get money to continue the killing of men, enslaving women and forcing them into harems and forcing little boys to become eunuchs.

There wasn't anything noble about it. It was successful because Europe was divided and fighting each other.

Learn your history and the corruption of Islam by Muslim men that has existed since Adam. Muslim leaders have never been forced to live up to Sharia law. They had hundreds if not thousands of wives. *** The great warrior-emperors of early Ottoman history gave way, with some important exceptions, to weak and indolent rulers, addicted to drink, drugs, and the

pleasures of the harem.***

Hmmm, does this sound like Sharia to you? Do you know of one sultan that was punished according to Sharia then or today? This is the corrupted Islam that was handed to modern times and that you mistake as pure.

Our leaders interior the U. S. have in no way lost their chilly war mentality and so proceed to tell others our form of Democracy is the main suitable for them. To the different question approximately Egyptians, the U. S. has consistently tried to meddle in Egyptians affairs...flow back to Nassar attempting for open Egyptian and the united statesunseated him. Then flow to Mubarak , Sadat's 2nd in command interior the defense force and the U. S. below then Bush Jr. tried to united statesa. him while he resisted the perception in WMD (weapons of mass destruction) the united statesneeded believed. we don't have confidence our acquaintances properly and because of this Egyptians electorate do no longer desire our interference. Now Obama desires to impression Egypt's next government and not for Egyptian's Democracy yet for western desires. we could desire to be careful what we want for clean democracy in Egypt skill The Muslim Brotherhood on the polltoo.

Democracies are governed by the population.

Sharia was made by a couple of people, their authors.

It's neither up- to- date nor impartial..

The US can't just attack any country. Henceforth, the rest of the question is invalid.

because they dont have a powerful military.