Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why do you think people "deserve" welfare or a "fair share of the pie"?

First off, I would preferably like to hear this from people that are on welfare or know people on welfare or are just strong supporters of the welfare system. My question is, why do people on welfare feel that they "deserve" money from rich people? Why do the wealthy have to share a piece of their "pie"? If I work very hard to make a nice "pie" for myself (pie being a business, company, product, service, etc. that makes me earn a lot of money), why should I share it with people who didn't work as hard as I did to make a good living?

I know some of you may say that people on welfare with kids should get money to support there kids, but I have a very simple solution to that if you don't make a lot of money. DON'T HAVE KIDS! I know that may be a tough concept for some to understand but there are many resources for birth control, so if you ask me, that is a lame excuse.

Some people may say that poor people don't have a chance to make a good living, but that is a poor argument as well. I go to college with several people who had rough childhoods. There are men like Andrew Carnegie and Rockefeller who grew up extremely poor without an education and became the wealthiest men in history. In fact, most millionaires in this day and age are self made (as in, they didn't start with money, and they earned their living by hard work and intelligence).

Some may say that people are disabled. This I can kind of understand, but in my opinion, if you are disabled you can still choose to be productive or do nothing. My mom works with a teacher who is blind, and he is one of the best teachers in the school. Helen Kellar was deaf and blind and still made a contribution to the world, earning a bachelors degree and becoming a political activist. If you are mentally handicapped, I could understand at that point because a person who is mentally handicapped does have a right to life and liberty, which could be nearly impossible to achieve through mere hard work. That being said, if you are just "less intelligent" and not actually mentally handicapped, that is a very lame excuse because you have just as much ability to learn and contribute, but you choose to make the excuse that it won't work and don't even try. We live in a day and age with libraries in almost every major city, new books being written and released every day on every subject, and an internet that connects all of us as well as the information of nearly every man on earth, so the resources for learning and growing exist.

So what is it? Why do we have a welfare system that benefits the ignorant and the lazy for doing nothing but sucking the lifeblood of society? Also, as far as my political views, I am not a republican or a democrat. Economically I lean more towards republicans, but I also believe in the right to choose (although not in the way we have it), medical benefits for everyone (we all have the right to life), and gay marriage (they don't hurt me).

Update:

I suppose it's a little late for this, but to those of you bringing up medical issues, I did say at the end that I believe everybody should be covered for medical issues. I suppose I believe in a "socialized" medicare system. I agree that people that get cancer and get toppled with insane medical bills should not have to deal with that. I do feel that making those people pay for an unfortunate situation is unfair, and as I said, everybody has the right to Life. When you make people pay insane amounts to save their life. I am quoting the Declaration of Independence when I say that each of us has the right to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

Update 2:

Another detail that I think is a little late to add is that I do believe in unemployment benefits, but only for a short time (no more than 4 years). I think that there are times when the economy is bad and people get laid off and it may take some time to get back on their feet, so they need a kind of buffer to keep them from going under, and I think that unemployment is a great buffer. It also gives people with strong skills in certain areas like science or business more of a chance to find a job that will make them most productive to society, rather then just taking a job at burger king where they will not be able to contribute as much as they are capable of.

18 Answers

Relevance
  • jxt299
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    A few reasons. 1. The French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution. Lesson: starving people will overthrow their governments violently, they will mass execute the ruling class. We don't want that here, do we?

    2. Businesses like more customers. They actually do. They like people to walk in their doors able to buy things rather than to just look, longingly, or to steal what they need. So having people who can't get work for one reason or another with money to buy things helps businesses. That keeps people employed. Whats wrong with that?

    3. You do not want a wealthy ruling class of idle rich who do nothing but cash dividend checks, do you? Idle rich who have too much money, too much power, and never actually do or produce anything. Its OK for them to be rich, but not super rich, tax their money away and use it to hire people to do important work like repair the infrastructure. You do not want all the roads and bridges and aqueducts and sewers and schools and military equipment to fall apart, do you? Tax the rich, its good for them!

  • justa
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    Sad truth here, we don't take care of our own. Every family has their not-quite-right, or slow relative, in other times we took them in, along with the widow left without a cent, or the maiden aunt. Women particularly were prone to be living off the charity of better off relatives, as unpaid houseworkers often, since jobs for women were scarce.

    Now you don't hear about the son taking in the mother, they move states away and don't want the responsibility since he and his wife both work, that didn't used to happen either, or maybe mom is a handful and they let the state work it out rather than keep her at home. Your question never even covers the millions who work that one half hour less than a full time position, and there isn't anything else available where they live, and without it, there isn't enough to pay the rent, let alone afford transportation.

    Then there is the other fact of life, you can have a job, and marry, have a house, and have a couple of kids, and the plant moves to China, and you now have a house, two kids, and no job or money coming in, or your next job is where they like to keep you under full time.

    Kids don't go away if your company moves, and their feet don't stop growing and they still get hungry three times a day.

    Circumstances can change, and birth control isn't retroactive.

    I know some mentally challenged people on welfare, she's got about the mental capacity of a thirteen year old, but a physically adult body, she's twenty three.

    Married and a mother, the government watches her carefully because she doesn't always remember she has to feed and change the baby all the time.

    Her husband is little better than she is, but they are both sweet people, just ones that never quite grow up. What should we do with the 'now' of their situation?

    They both work in sheltered jobs too, those pay slave wages btw.

    You speak of working hard, can you imagine what its like to patch two or three jobs together to keep food on the table? Many on welfare do work, and some would work more, but they have sick kids, and if they go off welfare and get a job that pays more, they couldn't afford to have the kids treated, so they work less.

    One of the things the Affordable Care Act will do is help people like that be able to work and still get coverage they can't afford with lower incomes.

    Most people use welfare for a short period, you can't do it more than five years, and in some places you do need to work too.

    You might enjoy the site below, for a different way of looking at the 'self-made millionaire''. And what they say about it.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    You have a rich person attitude. I grew up in a dirt poor family (that took no govt. help- we'd often go hungry before getting anything from a food kitchen), but my parents were from comfortably well off families so I grew up with a rich person attitude too. Saving money for a later date when money is short, educating myself to better myself, obeying laws,... Poor people with poor person attitudes don't think this way. If they save too much money they don't get free housing or food or phones or whatever. If they get a job they lose that too. There is no benefit to raising themselves above their current position because they feel there is no way they can get up above the position they are in. You mentioned people having kids- that should give you a clue right off they probably aren't the brightest people around. Drop out of school at 15 and raise your kid...It doesn't matter if they COULD get out of the cycle of welfare they were born into, they don't know any other way of life so won't change. Only when republicans are able to make life so miserable for welfare reciepients who are able to work (and actually are near places that will hire them) will anything change. If republicans REALLY wanted to cut out welfare, they'd slowly reduce benefits every year or two. Problem is, republicans don't really want to change the system, they just want to scream about it. I know a number of people that call themselves republicans that own apartment houses that house the section 8 welfare people. They are getting rich off welfare. Same with store owners that accept food stamps. Same with businesses that supply the majority of the food items that people buy with food stamps.

    Source(s): Offer a $500 cash reward to poor people for getting "fixed" and you'd cut down the problem quickly and save $$ billions.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    I have a very good friend who always worked hard, had a successful real estate business and developed cancer. Her health insurance paid very little, she depleted her life savings paying medical bills. She was fortunate enough to find a job at a hospital where she got health insurance and she worked in the cafeteria as long as she could until the cancer and treatment became too much for her. She went on SSI and Medicaid and moved in with her elderly parents. Her story is not unique and I am thankful that our country has a system that helps take care of our own. She is om Medicare and Medicaid and will be going on a clinical trial shortly. She will die, but by going on a clinical trial she may be able to help others.

    This is a side of life selfish people as yourself do not see or bother to investigate.

    I hope this will never happen to you. Too bad you are self centered. Are we to throw our sick, elderly, or children out to fend for themselves?

  • 8 years ago

    I deserve a piece of the pie because I have worked since I was 15yrs old. Paid my income and sales taxes to the state government until I got laid off when I was 50. Unemployment benefits kept my head above water. My home didn't fall into disrepair, which kept my neighbors property values intact. I could shop locally to keep their businesses open. I could remain healthy so I could be able to work. My home and car could be insured so I could remain a responsible citizen.

    I helped pay for the pie, and won't be bullied into not being able to take a slice when I need it.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    8 years ago

    Living on welfare isn't fun, at all. You barley get enough money to survive and need to live in ghetto areas. Also, you cannot keep getting welfare unless you do job training or something like that. And most millionairs this day and age are not self made, I would be suprised if even 10% were. Katnigy and Rockafeller are just two examples out of millions and millions of people born into poverty, it isn't an easy cycle to break.

  • Bill P
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    If they have contributed to the pie, why not. People work, they pay taxes why shouldn't they then get assistance when needed.

    Obama Gravy Train, "Liberals simply want to make everyone equal" and you say this is wrong. Didn't I read somewhere that "all men are created equal"? That's right, the American Declaration of Independence.

  • 8 years ago

    I work with the elderly and yes some people deserve welfare and food stamps. The elderly are the forgotten ones. Some of the people I work with have worked and paid into the system their entire lives but now they need a little help. Some of them have to choose between eating and the cost of their medications. And with Washington cutting most of their fuel assistance they now have to use that extra money for heating for the winter. They desire it, they worked for it and in some cases they fought for it (veterans).

  • ?
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    Welfare people deserve nothing except an opportunity to succeed just like everyone else by taking advantage of educating themselves, having initiative, good attitude and strong work ethic.

  • 8 years ago

    I don't have the time to read this, but will say that I dislike the welfare system; it is easy to abuse. However, we have used it to excess and it wouldn't be smart to take it away now. Especially if done abruptly.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.