Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Paleontology question about evidence?

Ok, so I'm trying to reasearch about dinosaurs, and I look EVERYWHERE on the internet and cannot find ANYTHING that is empirical. ex) I look for a dino like Pedopenna Daohugouensis and I can't find many things. 1) I can't find EMPIRICALLY all fossil finds there are 2) I can't find the discoverers articles about the fossil and how they found it (and if I could, how could I read it?) 3) I can't find any of it's basic traits. These problems (and many more) come up frequently make me wonder, where can I find any empirically proven and documented evidence of fossils (like the one above). Please help, thank you.

2 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    The fossil list is solid information for evolution. The oldest creatures got here across are about the least confusing (Archean micro organism, about 3.5 billion years old). In older fossil layers you note less demanding creatures and a lot less range, at times interrupted by technique of mass extinction events. no human being has ever got here across a creature in an section the position it wasn't anticipated by technique of evolution. as well that, there is comparative anatomy. sturdy anatomists can note of each groove, hollow, and curve in bone. searching at previous animals, they can make sure the position the animal ought to have fit evolutionarily per bone structure, between different issues. Fossils have also printed a plethora of "transitional varieties", like Archeopteryx (from theropod dinosaurs to birds), Ambulocetus (from land mammal to whale), and Icthyostega (from lobe-finned fishes to pre-amphibian tetrapods). And, of route, they have sturdy information for growing old the rocks, so the equipment isn't arbitrary in any respect. Radioactive relationship measures the contents of radioactive isotopes in a fabric when it comes to the quantity of "daughter" isotope the former produces. opposite to what's usually theory, carbon-14 won't be able to be used as a lot as now issues older than some thousand years. For relationship issues million of years old, they wrestle to locate radioactive istopes of argon and potassium, and for even older issues they could attempt to locate isotopes of uranium.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.