Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
WOW, look at those profits, are children shot dead with a gun supposed to be good for business?
http://news.yahoo.com/fearful-ban-frenzied-buyers-...
Dear Lord Gawd, please do not feed this thought to the greedy bastards without any morals selling guns in America...chances are they would see paying some nutball big bucks to shoot up a school as a good investment.
I own a small business, I sell stuff, but I am damn glad right now I don't sell guns, I would feel dirty and would be donating the excess profit to the victims.
Do you think even a dime of these record profits will ever see it's way to Newtown to compensate the families of the dead children whose death is the main driving force behind all the sales?
Or will it be used to refresh the gun stores gun stock, expansion maybe, toss a few thousand at the NRA to make sure it can happen again because children shot dead with a Bushmaster 223 is good for the business of selling the Bushmaster 223?
7 Answers
- Uncle RupertLv 48 years agoFavorite Answer
The guns didn't do it. The laws passed to keep guns off the premises and off the streets and banned every where did because law abiding people who carry are unable to protect and the evil people that know that are the culprits.
- Anonymous4 years ago
despite the fact that i individually locate it to be an extremely, very unwise and unsafe practice, i won't stand in desire of allowing the government to alter what shade a firearms is. Brandishing a weapon with out justification is unlawful, regardless of what shade it rather is. To require weapons to be black or silver is an infringement on firearms progression. despite the fact that absurd, I could desire to settle for that somebody needless to say properly-knownshows a use for those. I additionally does no longer ban toy weapons in easy of recent neon weapons. I already think of it rather is incorrect that toy weapons could desire to be vibrant orange. as quickly as lower back, brandishing a weapon is unlawful, whether the weapon is fake, and that orange strip isn't any criminal risk-free practices. And no longer something stops somebody from using orange to their actual gun, or eliminating it from a pretend one. rather, it rather is a sort of cases the place the government is constitutionally limited (nevertheless I doubt which will quit them). vibrant weapons do no longer impact national commerce, protection, or treaties, and so as that they could have a confusing time looking federal authority for this type of ban. of direction, that's what they mentioned appropriate to the 1994 ban, and it have been given via.
- Anonymous8 years ago
They must be preparing for that zombie apocolypse/Obama gun ban
- MikeLv 78 years ago
It's not the death of the children that caused it, but rather the response of liberal politicians to those deaths.
- 8 years ago
Democrats are the ones responsible for skyrocketing gun sales.
Are you proud of yourself?
- Anonymous8 years ago
You libs caused it by being gun snatch happy. Good job once again. Your hearts MIGHT be in the right place, but your lack of brains is showing (again). Seriously, WTF did you think would happen?