Was it pretty much a bold move by Gandhi to call Christians by implication "anti-Christs"?

You really do need to get an education. Your ignorance is showing.

EDIT: "Tune "myself in? No Ghandi was not bold in saying this, it just backed up his statement that he liked Christ but did not like Christianity. Ghandi's purported dislike of Christianity had very little to do with the collapse of Empire. Like I said, your ignorance is showing.

EDIT" : LMAO I disagree with you and that makes me a trouble maker? No you don't need to tell me about "Be the change you want to see in the world", you do need to explain what Ghandi's statement has to do with the collapse of Empire, that's what your original question was, "and before the British Empire knew what happened, the rug was already pulled from under their feet? " before you started to move the goalposts.

Gandhi was a India statesman , not a world one. Interesting how people will like to quote Gandhi, when his experience with Christians was limited as is his Biblical knowledge and understanding.................http://members.shaw.ca/bmaundy/Extras/Proof_of_One...

Yes! But it was the truth by Gandhi!

By definition "anti" means "against"!

Every single Christian is an Antichrist!

(1) Group 1 says Jesus is God - Jesus said he was not God [John 17:3]

(2) Group 2 says Jesus was the Son of God - Jesus said he was not the Son of God but Son of Man [Luke 22:70]

(3) Group 3 says Jesus died for their sins - Jesus said he came to call sinners to repentance [Luke 5:32]

It must be obvious that on every key issue the Christians are on the opposite side of Jesus = ANTI!

Christians aspire to be like Christ - they are rarely if ever successful. I'm sure Ghandi noticed that many of his followers failed to emulate his example under certain circumstances. Ghandi was a uniquely wise man, but I cannot fathom why he should have expected all christians to be perfect copies of Christ.

no it was a foolish remark by gandhi not a bold statement