If the SEC is so good, why are they losing to Duke?

You'd have to ask SEC fans that. The average fan however could tell you that Texas A&M can't stop anyone defensively hence why they've already given up 35 points and there is still 2 minutes left in the 1st half.

A&M had a great comeback, but they were 14 point favorites. Doesn't matter that they finished 4th in the SEC, according to SEC fans, they're supposed to beat everyone and soundly, not play a game like that.

Duke has a solid offense, and SEC schools aren't used to playing against good offenses. Heck a&m has probably been the best sec offense for a couple years now and thats only because they are a Big 12 school.

They are just get run over right now, it looks like Duke could hang 70 on them if they want to.

Now Duke lost to the SEC.

The SEC isn't, only Texas A&M is. Now if Duke loses, it's to an SEC team. See how that works? Good, now you can work for ESPN.

Duke isn't playing the SEC. They are playing Texas A&M - one team in the SEC - and not even located in South Eastern U.S. like the other SEC members.

It appears that Duke is having a better record that most SEC teams.

Duke is a good team though. The ACC is legit. Florida State is easily the best team in the nation. Clemson is pretty good. Duke isn't too far behind. and Miami with a healthy team is a top 25 team as well.

A team that won its division in the ACC just lost to a team from the SEC that finished fourth in its division. The ACC is a joke. None of them ever beat anybody who's any good outside their conference. But they look good against Murray St, Savannah St, Nevada, Idaho, Bethune-Cookman.....

Losing to Duke is not an embarrassment. Falling out of favor with your coach, now that is something to be ashamed of.

LMAO.. You should have waited until the game was over... Texas A&M 52-48... Now your question embarrasses you...