Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Card hand probability?
Ms X and 3 other players are dealt 5 cards each from a standard pack.
We know that Ms X has got exactly 1 ace.
What is the probability that none of the 3 others have got more aces than Ms X ?
@Michael, ÷/0, Nick: I believe that none of your answers are correct. Do note that Ms X has *exactly* 1 ace, and that each person has been dealt 5 cards
Divide By Zero: Your answer is near, but not quite correct, which you may spot if you go over it with a toothcomb.
Divide By Zero, in your revised expression, shouldn't you apply "Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander" ?
2 Answers
- Divide By ZeroLv 77 years agoFavorite Answer
Edit #3 -- M3, I'm pretty confident in my answer, since I used one straight-forward method and one brutish method which both agree. I would probably be willing to place a wager on my answer, since I am a gambling man ;)
My first method works because only one person can get >1 ace. That's why it doesn't over-count anything when I multiply by the 3 players, so there's no need to worry about overlap or inclusion-exclusion. My 2nd method works because it explicitly counts all combos and partitions of the 15 cards dealt to the opponents (though I omitted the C(9,4) in the numerator and denominator since they cancel).
Edit #4 -- Aha, good thing you are kind and didn't accept the wager.
There are not 51 cards left in the deck, there are 47, since as you reiterated, Ms X has exactly 1 ace meaning her other cards are known. What threw me is that they're not known specifically. But they are known to be non-aces, so that still subtracts from the deck for our purposes here.
1 - 3*[C(3,2)*C(44,3) + C(44,2)] / C(47,5) = 995/1081 = 92.0444%
And my 2nd method becomes:
Pr(someone has 2 aces) =
C(3,2) * C(44,13) * C(13,3) + .
C(44,12) * C(3,2) * C(12,3)
/ C(47,15) / C(14,4)
Pr(someone has 3 aces) = C(44,12) * C(12,2) / C(47,15) / C(14,4)
** EDIT #5 final bleeping edit I hope! **
Yes changed the 48's to 44's int he 2nd method but forgot to in the 1st. Fixed. It took me a minute to know what the heck you were talking about with sauce and geese lol. What's good for the denominator is good for the numerator indeed.
- MichaelLv 77 years ago
Well,
this is what i propose :
let be X1, X2, X3, X4 the random variables representing the number of aces in the hands of players N0 1, 2, 3, 4
Mr X is called player 1, he has X1 = 1 ace in hand : P(X1 = 1) = 1
let's compute the complementary event E2 : one player hes more aces than player 1 :
we can notice that, as there are 4 aces, only 1 among the 3 can have more aces:
(E2 | X1 = 1) = ...
= (X2 = 2 | X1 = 1) υ (X3 = 2 | X1 = 1) υ (X4 = 2 | X1 = 1) υ (X2 = 3 | X1 = 1) υ (X3 = 3 | X1 = 1) υ (X4 = 3 | X1 = 1)
the events are "exclusive" (french vocabulary : A ∩ B = ∅ ==> P(A υ B) = P(A) + P(B) )
and :
P(X2 = 2 | X1 = 1) = P(X3 = 2 | X1 = 1) = P(X4 = 2 | X1 = 1)
and :
P(X2 = 3 | X1 = 1) = P(X3 = 3 | X1 = 1) = P(X4 = 3 | X1 = 1)
then for every ace:
P(X2 = 2 | X1 = 1) = 4*P(X2 = 2 | X1 = ace of heart)
with : in the hand of X2 : 2 aces among 3 times 2 "any" cards among 52 - 4 aces = 48
possibilities on 5 cards among 52 - 1 ace (in player_1's hand) = 51
P(X2 = 2 | X1 = ace of heart) = 3C2 * 48C3 / 51C5 and 51C5 = 51*50*49*48*47/(5*24)=51*10*49*47
= 3 * 48 * 47 * 46 /3 / (51*49*47*10)
# 0,088355342...
so : times 4, so to cover all cases
==> P(X2 = 2 | X1 = 1) # 0,35342
same procedure for :
P(X2 = 3 | X1 = 1) = 4*P(X2 = 3 | X1 = ace of heart)
P(X2 = 3 | X1 = ace of heart) = 3C3 * 48C2 / 51C5
= 1 * 48 * 47 /2 / (51*49*47*10)
# 0000960384
==> P(X2 = 3 | X1 = 1) = 0,003841537
# 0,3573
therefore :
P(X2 has more aces | X1 = 1) # 0,35342 + 0,003841537
# 0,3573
and finally :
P(no player has two aces or more | X1 = 1) # 0,6427 = 64.27%
hope it' ll help !!