How are the Chicago Bears supposed to win the NFC North when they cannot even win a game against Buffalo?

Because the NFC North stinks, that conference can be won with an 8-8 record.

First of all, it's one game. Secondly, I don't really think the Bears will make the playoffs or had any hope of it. Green Bay is going to run away with that division. Then the wildcard in my opinion comes down to a whole list of possibilities including Chicago, Detroit, Sea/SF (whoever doesn't win the west), Atl/NO (whoever doesn't win the south), Arizona, Carolina....Out of that list, I don't think they have a shot anyway.

What the game showed is just how volatile their offense can be and just how much of a weakness they have on Defense. It'll be interesting to see how they play next week.

I think it's the other way around. how did the bills manage to only beat the Bears by 3? They should have won by at least 10. Bills are a solid team, bears are a overly pathetic team

Because how one team does one week doesn't necessarily affect how they'll do the next season.

Turnovers will kill you! 2 INT, 1 Fumble, which I heard was on the 15 yard line. 7 quick points. So that makes the score 16-20 bears win. But, the turn overs kill you. I've spent plenty of time in Vegas, everyone will bet against the Bears next week, saying there no good. And, couldn't beat the Bills. 3 TO's, you probably won't win, 4 shouldn't win, 5 or more! Never! But there's an exception to every rule. Remember the Bears/Cardinal game? 07, I think. Da Bears came back and won! 6 TURNOVERS! Da Bears 24-23!

Well you better start crying for next week