What are your thoughts on the debate between Matt Dillahunty and Sye Ten Bruggencate?

Haven't been paying the slightest bit of attention, don't intend to start. If you'd given us a summary, I might have had an opinion.

May the best man win

Matt destroyed the apologist idiot. Sye had absolutely no foundation for his arguments, except to constantly berate Dilahunty with nonsensical philosophical conundrums like, "Well, how can you say you know anything? You can't know anything." Then he would profess to "know" that the Bible is true because the Bible says it's true. This is why Matt says he will never debate apologists again, and I don't blame him. It's like trying to reason with a three-year-old.