Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 6
? asked in Science & MathematicsBiology · 6 years ago

Why haven't more larger animals evolved to eat trees?

Update:

I mean bark, trunk matter. All of that biomatter, and nothing around to eat it except some insects?

Update 2:

sorry, I don't mean larger larger animals, I mean a greater variety of large animals that eat tree material, thank you.

Update 3:

possibility: saplings

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 years ago

    There were large mammals like mammoths and mastodons during the last ice age, but they became extinct since the end of the last ice age. Today's climate is warmer than the climate during the last ice age, and the African elephant is the largest land mammal. It can peel bark off trees. Anything larger than the African elephant would simply be unable to survive because the climate is too warm. Large animals have proportionally smaller surface to volume ratios. The African elephant partly compensates for this by having large flat ears to increase the amount of body surface. The ears are filled with blood vessels, which allow the hot blood to be cooled by breezes. Think of the elephant's ears as functionally similar to the radiator of an automobile. Animals that are larger would need even larger ears to avoid heat strokes. The warm climate may be why no animals larger than elephants have evolved since the end of the last ice age.

  • Nate
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    There are some physical limitations to how large a land animal can get before a body can no longer support its weight.

    I forget what its called exactly, but basically each extra foot in any direction is an extra cubic foot of stuff.

  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    Thay have as well as many smaller ones too. Have you never been in an area where the trees are managed and the wardens have put fencing around the trees to protect them. Many organisms consume tree bark or damage it getting to organisms, e.g. beetle larvae, under the bark, or to get a sap. The dead, dry bark on older trees tends not to be eaten unless animals are starving, simply because its nutrient content is extremely low.

  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    You serious?

    If lots of large animals evolve to eat trees, they eat all the trees, then they all die from lack of food.

    The system evolves to balance.

    Update.

    That stuff is cellulose, which is fcuking hard to digest. The energy required to digest it, and the time taken to digest it, would make the animal lethargic, and easy for predators to catch.

  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    Haven't you seen cows buffalos ziraffe s rihnosaurs elephants?

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    Oh, they did, but then a great big meteor crashed down and ended that.

    Since the end-of-Cretaceous extinction event, we've had ice ages. Ice ages tend to be harsh on big animals.

  • 6 years ago

    Because they realized that they weren't getting any muscles from doing so. More muscles=stronger=protect themselves against predators.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.