is the worst thing about Hillary Clinton, not that she is unethical and corrupt?

They seem to be bllinded to her failings, they care only about a female becoming President. A female president is no better than a male, and thats true in any country. The older women ought to know better. We remember the scandals of the 1990s. And when Hillary moved out of the W.H. and stole the silver and china, she said she was broke but she is now worth $30 million and Bill $80 million. She is the worst person to ever run for President, a manufactured candidate. She hasnt an honest bone in her body.

No probably the worse thing is that conservatives have called Hillary unethical and corrupt for 35 years, conservatives have tried made up scandal after made up scandal about her without any thing ever being proven, and yet those on the far right think it is some how magically fact that she is guilty of something.

I guess the far right media has done a good job of brainwashing you.

The worst thing about hillary clinton is that people who have hated her for 20 years assume every bad thing they hear about her is true, and dont' really care too much about proof or evidence. They just go on feelings and impressions. And then you end up with ignorant, stupid questions like this one which make assumptions about Hillary's so-called corruption and bad ethics, which are no worse than any other candidate.

Like those that supported Kennedy cared that he was unethical and corrupt, right? Or Nixon? Or Reagan? Clinton? Bush?

Please. If you support a politician, any politician, you're outright admitting that you're willing to overlook the fact that in this system of governance our elected officials are required to be unethical and corrupt to get elected.

The authority of government and its representatives is rarely questioned. Although almost always a government is composed of provable criminals, cheats and liars, it still has a solid basis for it's authority.

If a normal person acted like government, they would be characterized as cunning, secretive and manipulative, and either be diagnosed as insane, or locked up as a danger to society, or both. The question remains: why do people tolerate this?

One part of the answer is in social dynamics: opinion and behavior is engineered via education and media. In other words: are you surprised?

No. She is neither unethical nor corrupt. And, twenty five years of the Republican scandal machine trying to convince people she is have not worked. The voters will elect her as the next president.

There is no law that a Clinton has broken that has not been prosecuted to the full extent of the law. So far she is free and clear of any legal convictions.

The same thing can be about anyone who supports most politicians. Over look it in their candidate but not the candidates on the other team.

She's not. It those of you who are naive enough to believe all the garbage conservative groups feed you who think that. Try thinking for yourself for a change.

yes