When the Liberal media says someone's a racist, does that mean they're losing the argument?

That's the way it works when they are out of think tanks and the ill-informed and addlebrained news anchors available try to suffocate the overwhelming superiority of a conservative guest by substracting credibility from him by playing the racist card whenever they lose and they take advantage of the extensive multiculturalist agenda swallowed by so many who think it is a political umbrella to protect the differences but don't know the ultimate goal of this agenda is the obliteration of all cultures and the imposition of just one which will have some nuances of the others but will eventually perish too in favor of the anti-culture or atheism.

This works perfectly in the realm of false rightist and leftist media tycoons belong to a same race and when the topics of economy, gender equality and security arise they turn it from political matter to the worst demagoguery where aligned thinking is progressive and the currents against it come from antisocial haters, racists. Their annoyance against those who they think have segregatory insights makes them play the offended minority when they perceive their debaters as superior minds and so they repeat the argument of racism to exhaustation until their debaters leave.

Indefectibly we can witness it on the Anglo-American TV which has been kidnapped by the same media moguls almost entirely, the British Parliament tries to take the big business out of the hands of one of them while in America they live in permanent state of celebration due to their fusions beyond the law, their every time more bigger monopolies and the way they have put politics to their side since AIPAC was created to shape American politics according to foreign aspirations instead of those of America's sons.

No, it means the person has said or done racist things. I know this is your new talking point to excuse racism, but it isn't working. The only people who buy into it are the people brainwashed by conservative media.

Notice how nobody has said Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, John McCain are racist, because they don't say and do racist stuff.

No. It means you should examine the reasons they're calling the person racist. You know, those things called "facts" that you dimwits like to ignore? Then, once you examine the facts, if you're actually able to do that based on your limited reasoning skills, you can arrive at a logical conclusion. But whatever...feel free to stick with your idiotic premise.

Losing???? They lost it. If you can't bring up facts, call them either Nazi's or racist. The discussion is over. We can do the same by referring to them as stupid pansy's or snowflakes that need a petting zoo.

definition of liberalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. Whereas classical liberalism emphasizes the role of liberty, social liberalism stresses the importance of equality.[4]

Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programs such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality, and international cooperation.

in a country like america, which is of the people, for the people, and by the people, the idea that a group would remove these values through majority, or mob rule, is an affront to the very values we live by.

why would i care to lose any of these liberal freedoms?

More like they don't have an argument.

Democrats are going to have to change their tactics if they ever want to return to power.

I think we are all sick of the division, the identity politics, and calling half of the country deplorable racists.

Of course not.

What you say is illogical, especially we have an openly racist as a president elect.

Yes, another queue of a losing argument is when libs bring up Hitler.

Most of the time, yes.