Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 4
? asked in Politics & GovernmentLaw & Ethics · 4 years ago

Did Trump break the law when he went on a Twitter rant speaking to NFL owners about the players?

18 U.S. Code § 227 - Wrongfully influencing a private entity’s employment decisions by a Member of Congress or an officer or employee of the legislative or executive branch

(a) Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—

(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or

(2) influences, or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(b) In this section, the term “covered government person” means—

(1) a Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;

(2) an employee of either House of Congress; or

(3) the President, Vice President, an employee of the United States Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, or any other executive branch employee (as such term is defined under section 2105 of title 5, United States Code).

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes. Not the first time, won't be the last time.

  • 4 years ago

    Try READING your one source.

    He DID NOT take or withhold ANY official government action, threaten to do so, or ask anyone to do so.

    Therefore, based on what YOU copied in your question he DID NOT break the law you cited.

    Additionally, the law only prohibits taking such actions SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF PARTISAN POLITICAL AFFILIATION. He suggested firing players on the basis of there ACTIONS, not their party.

    That make BOTH essential elements of a violation false.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    4 years ago

    .

    oooo! good find.

    dt's handlers must be beside themselves over this :

    the junta, newly empowered by their stealth coup: generals kelly, mcmasters & mattis.

    x

    General Kelly, chief of wh staff :

    Attachment image
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    I'm not sure if he did or didn't, but he DOES need to learn his place.

  • 4 years ago

    No, because he was speaking figuratively. Here's the quote:

    "Wouldn't you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say 'get that son of a b**** off the field right now - he's fired."

    Had you read that before, or is this the first time?

  • 4 years ago

    YES!!!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.