Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is “more additional” bad grammar?
Is “more additional” bad grammar? Example: Candidates would have an incentive to seek a recount in any state in which they thought the recount would give them more additional votes than their opponent.
15 Answers
- Anonymous2 years ago
Use either "more" or "additional". Do not use both.
- Anonymous2 years ago
Eh, not really. As everyone else is saying, it does sound redundant, but for whatever reason, it's one of those things that flows nicely despite not being technically correct
- bluebellbkkLv 72 years ago
The answers from Dan and A.J. show a deeper understanding of the possible correct usage.
- Barney GoogleLv 72 years ago
YES!!! you don't need additional. It is a style choice to use either 'more' (the correct option) or the second 'additional.' Use 'additional' in a financial statement, or when talking to a policeman.. Keep it simple.
- Anonymous2 years ago
Normally, it is redundant, more meaning the same as additional. It is possible to have a special case of "additional" as a category and "more" the added quantity of it. They offered more additional services and fewer base services.
Using "Very very" is also redundant.
Add, in reviewing the precise content, "more additional" is valid in the special case.
seek a recount --- would give them more additional votes than their opponent
The original counts are assumed to be missing valid votes
Each candidate is expected to get "additional votes" as a category of votes.
More than the other candidate of the additional votes is valid.
- ?Lv 72 years ago
No in this sentence that is the correct usage, as both candidates can possibly get additional votes, so it matters who get more number of additional votes.
- Anonymous2 years ago
Makes no sense. They’re synonymous.