Uh-oh, Sondland just admitted that Trump held funds from Ukraine in exchange for investigating the Bidens, not concerns of corruption at all?

 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

What you witnessed is Sondland changing his testimony and conveniently leaving this out of his prepared statement. "But let us look at some of what Ambassador Sondland had said previously.

“And as I recall, he was in a very bad mood. It was a very quick conversation. He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing,’ Sondland testified President Trump said in closed door testimony.

“And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation,” he said."

Big freaking woopie the funds were already promised to the Ukraine long before this phone call it's not illegal to tie the funding up. There is no legal obligation for the president to give a foreign country money even if he says that he's going to give it to them. This conduct maybe what you call inappropriate but it's still not a freaking crime. It's not bribery. In fact it's absolutely nothing at all because when Donald Trump released the money that he promised earlier he took absolutely nothing he didn't get a favor he didn't get a pat on the back. this was I did you a favor now how about you doing me a favor. And now there's some evidence emerging that Donald Trump had every right to ask for an investigation. Due to a very significant amount of money spent over there by the biddens . Well there's no crime in spending money it's certainly prudent to ask where that money was going to!

You know, the aid was given on the condition that Ukraine would fight corruption. Removing the aid until Ukraine upholds their side of the arrangement is actually legal, you know. lol

So where's the corruption?

A nothing burger after today's testimony is still a nothing burger.  LOL