Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
8 Answers
- JimZLv 71 year agoFavorite Answer
To be fair, most "terrorists" don't sell oil but Saudis practically funded Al Qaeda and all that perpetrated the attacks on the Twin Towers were Saudis. They are the good guys in that part of the world. Trying to decide who to buy oil from there is a bit like trying to decide which democrat to vote for. You just hold your nose and try to decide which isn't the worst. Alberta on the other hand doesn't support terrorists. They are pretty close to US and their oil would be added to supply to ease the costs. Their oil tends to be more expensive than fracked oil from North Dakota and other places but if they can sell for the going price, they should have every opportunity and we should be able to sell milk to Albertans without a 100% tariff as well. In the Mid East it is blood for oil and in North America it is oil for milk.
- Anonymous1 year ago
If we bought it from Canucland then we wouldn't get to spend a trillion a year on weapons. How are we going to support the military-industrial complex if we don't spend more than 50% of the rest of the world on weapons???
- Anonymous1 year ago
Any one you think you want it from.
- regeruggedLv 71 year ago
Neither. We have oil in the US, with enough to export refined petroleum products.