What is a 'socialist agenda' exactly and why is a 'socialist agenda' bad?

The actual socialist agenda is to create a society without billionnaires, in which people are paid according to their work (not for financial investments or speculation), and in which the workers/people own the means of production and decide how to use them - without trying to maximise profits.

unfortunately rightwing fearmongering newspeak-artists will hang the label on anything they (think you) don't like

daft trigger words,  that reps copy btw,  to try and add stigma, to a pretty rational  term...and all because they hate russia and communism  even though  it was the USA  who indirectly started the cold war  by ruthlessly ending the ww2 by dropping not 1 but 2  a-bombs,  and then hating on Russia when they discover that the russians also have an abomb...btw those 2 events are linked in quite a sinister way..

Not to mention that the term is now irrelevant to russia, because they are no longer  communist or even socialist,   but instead a conservative republic,   no shiit?...i wish these reps would bother to read just once in a while..

There is no clear and concise "socialist agenda", as socialism is a range of ideologies that have one thing in common: advocating social ownership of the means of production instead of private ownership.

All socialist ideologies agree on that, but disagree in terms of tactics, analysis, strategy, end goals (there are different forms of social ownership), and such. Ask an anarcho-syndicalist what their "agenda" is, and then ask a Marxist-Leninist what theirs is, and you'll get two completely different answers.