Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why did Picasso draw his paintings like stick cartoons?
Even if he wanted to use symbolism, he could have drawn paintings that seem like actual humans.. To me, it seems like he did it just to save time and convey the symbolism in the shortest time possible.
At least something of this quality would be good, most people would appreciate that it's hard for a painter to draw the strokes carefully to create something like this.
8 Answers
- Anonymous4 months ago
None of his figures look like stick figures!
Look, this is what young Picasso was capable of at just 15:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/89235234@N00/4356587...
Art in the late C19th/ early C20th had a crisis. Artists asked themselves what art was for in an age of photography and mechanized mass (re)production. It certainly wasn't to faithfully document the world anymore, so they travelled inwards, exploring the psyche, backwards, exploring primitive art and its meaning to the peoples who created it, and forwards, exploring the materiality of mediums. The horrors of WWI stemming from too powerful new technologies applied to old warfare methodologies made these questions all the more urgent to artists. Cubism is just one expression of these questions and explorations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism
Try to copy Picasso. Not a pastiche, really study the piece you're aiming to copy. You will soon find that only the man capable of producing the above self portrait at 15 had the skill and subtle eye required for those cubist portraits. They are neither simple nor sloppy.
- Anonymous4 months ago
His unique style.
- Anonymous4 months ago
Its called Cubism Art and Picasso was one of its creators. In his later years he mass produced his art by using dozens of artists and craftsmen. He would check out their work. If he liked it he would sign it.
- Anonymous4 months ago
He was quite capable of producing conventional art, but if that was all he did we would never have had something as brilliant as "Guernica" - but either you get it or you don't. Fortunately many people did.
- ?Lv 74 months ago
He was a great admirer of the British artist ' LS Lowry', and followed his style when depicting the human form.
- JohnLv 74 months ago
Yes, Picasso bashing has become fashionable among the less than sophisticated art spectator crowd.
- Ender772Lv 74 months ago
why dont we have famous singers from the 1600s? because no one could record them of course.. this we can record...not only is it art (subjectively) but its also history
also style...those who do something different tend to stand out
- ?Lv 74 months ago
Bigger question, why did people pay millions for his second rate, third grade scribbles?