Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would you agree that the state of WWE is concerning? ?
I think we all would agree that WWE’s creative team isn’t good at building new stars. However, they’ve really been dropping the ball lately. There are no new stars in RAW’s elimination chamber match. And then you have random pairings that make no sense! Why was Murphy involved with the Mysterio’s if he is no longer being used? Why is Garza with Miz and Morrison? It’s like, WWE is forming absolutely random factions that make no sense and then they’ll eventually quit using them altogether. Why? What’s the problem? Why form these useless stables just for them to not last long?
3 Answers
- CandleLv 73 months agoFavorite Answer
I don't think the goal is to build new stars anymore. I've said it up and down this message board for nearly a decade now: WWE is the star, not the talents. The brand is the star in Vince's mind, and the identity of the WWE no longer hangs on a singular face to represent the brand that can run off and go to hollywood or jump to the competition. At this point the WWE logo is just a pair of Mickey Mouse ears used to brand a wrestling product on a global market that has casual viewers no matter what the company does creatively.
- ?Lv 73 months ago
Not really. Their aim is to make money and they are making money now than they ever have. I don't like their creative but people are still watching. So unless people stop watching then they won't change, why would they. Plus if they went bust, another company would fill their place.