Why does a destruction of property while upset incurs prison time?

Having a conversation with somebody about something or somebody causing you an upset is acceptable in most circumstances, in fact, it is a positive and normal act of human behaviour in many circumstances.

Name one place you go to for school or work where one or more people can give you heck or grief for having discussions like this.

I move that in my opinion that a person's emotional set is part of human rights. Clashing safety laws with free speech will depreciate a man's right to openly feel appropriate emotions in tense or unsettling situations.

Suppose that any arising situation occurs where somebody is bullying you and you're supposed to support your local bullies instead of rallying with anti-bullying bureaus. Human rights is based on anti-bullying.

There's no right way or wrong way to express your thoughts against bullying. No democracy usually supports bullying people or hostile human rights abuses.

Bullying is going to be a factor that usually causes everyone an upset or an uproar. Those feelings should be allowed in the appropriate feelings during all situations of injustice. Protests are going to be angry anyway and nobody is permitted to change the judgment of other people in any way.

The only way an upset can incur some kind of punishment is when an upset is expressed by causing a riot in the office, disrupting a classroom or worrying the neighbours. It only occurs prison time if an upset is expressed by committing a real crime. Otherwise, the censorship people have no case and I get to have discussions with people about my reasonable upset while being scott free and innocent.