Liberals, I understand you're confused about what constitutes evidence, but what evidence have you seen that Gaetz is guilty of anything?

Wow, you liberals are even dumber than I previously thought.  For the idiot complaining about evidence of voting fraud, the fact is that election officials don't share their evidence (in the form of actual ballots, ballot envelopes, etc.) without a subpoena.  The people who went to court presented hundreds of pieces of evidence that something untoward was occurring, in the form of eyewitness affidavits.  That SHOULD have resulted in investigations and subpoenas, but didn't.  OK?  Grok that yet?

The DoJ has not announced that it is investigating him, that is still ONLY what allegedly honest reporters are alleging that alleged unnamed sources who allegedly are familiar with the situation say is happening.  Without a formal announcement, there is little reason to believe even that is true.  What we do know is there is an investigation, but we don't even know for sure into what.

LAB RAT, so are you in a roundabout way admitting that you don't have any evidence whatsoever outside what some reporter is telling you to believe?

The New York Times is not a valid news source.   If they don't show the evidence, it would be wise to be skeptical that it exists at all.  Evidence is what you've been shown, not what some third party claims they have or they've seen.

Gloria, you are the epitome of the ignorant left-wing woman.  This is not about letting anybody get away with anything.  It's about the left-wing's absurd and stupid belief that just because a newspaper claims something, it must perforce be true, even if they don't produce one shred of evidence.  If you're not skeptical, then you're a fool.

Spare me the twaddle about NYTimes.  They've published multiple false reports about Trump, allegedly from officials who are familiar with the situation, which have never come true.  Believe them at your own risk.  They are not trustworthy.

Bippy, thanks for the input from the peanut gallery.  But you're not even one of the more amusing liberal idiots on this site.

Orange, I don't have a problem with "evidence" you blithering blowhard, I have a problem with fools like you claiming there is evidence when none has been actually offered.