Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
17 Answers
- 3 weeks ago
The whole point of tennis(at least, as far as I am concerned) is the low camera angle/up-skirt views.
The game itself is bloody boring!
I just watch so I can feel depraved and sinful....
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
My question would be more along the lines of, why are they so short? If they are going to be that short, why not just wear shorts? 🩳
- 3 weeks ago
You see, while the uniform developed around the turn of the century, tennis is an ancient game. We can trace it to a group of 12th-century French monks who, while at play, hit a ball to one another with the flattened palms of their hands.
By the 16th century, the French and English aristocracy played a version of this jeu de paume with a rudimentary racket. The cousin of modern tennis sealed its place in the hearts of the gentry when Henry VIII built a court for the game at one of his palaces.
Our sporty little shorts and polos did not exist then. While the king did own several outfits designed specifically for tennis, they didn't vary too much from his usual daywear. In general, he and his (male) courtiers would have played in tights and breeches.
While such restrictive clothing no doubt taxed the Nadals and Federers of old, still the game spread across Europe. When tennis-like games came to the United States in the 18th and 19th centuries, rich Americans too played in their day clothes, and were, you can imagine, a little uncomfortable doing so.
It's fair to say that, around the turn of the 20th century, a game very much like contemporary tennis had developed and become a sport. But even then the dictates of modesty prevailed over those of performance—especially for women. Through the end of the 19th century, young ladies wore full bustles, dres' hats, and gloves on the court.
Nonetheless, this era saw the first tennis tournament. And, eventually, practicality won out. Competitive tennis called for new outfits. It called for tennis whites!
By about this time, the rich in America (and England) had adopted summer white as a symbol of their leisure. Since white clothing dirties easily, it didn't recommend itself to factory workers and domestic servants in a dry-cleaning-less era of weekly baths. In fact, really the only people suited to wear white were people who didn't work at all—or who could at least afford to look like they didn't.
Wearing white costs a lot. If you wore it, you signaled that you, too, cost a lot. Since tennis had long been a summer game for the rich, the rich wore white to play tennis. And—since the middle class likes to imitate the rich—as tennis democratized over the course of the 20th century, the middle class wore white to play, too.
Gradually, white for tennis became a rule, so that in 1890 Wimbledon mandated all-white outfits for players. Elsewhere, the all-white tennis outfit became a decorous standard by the early 20th century—just in time, by the way, for the Frenchwoman Suzanne Lenglen to aggravate rich people everywhere by playing tennis in a (white) calf-length skirt and short sleeves.
American flappers, however, saw no problem with this. As general hemlines rose, so too—and faster still—did the hemline of the tennis skirt. American Gussie Moran wore an above-the-knee skirt to compete at Wimbledon in 1949. Her ruffled white underwear showed with every movement, and photographers lay on the ground in order to best capture it. (As usual, men faced easier fashion choices. They began to wear white around the same time as women, but their move from pants to shorts over the first half of the 20th century made little stir.)
Unlucky Gussie. She was embarrassed, but a decade or so later, her short skirt was old news. We had reached the age of the white and the short, and most female athletes thought nothing of bearing their underwear while they played—or of wearing shorts instead. (Helen Jacobs was very first to do so at a major match, in 1933.) Over time, today's tennis whites became the standard outfit. Tight and colorful aberrances in the 1980s and early '90s met appropriate outrage.
Source(s): https://www.theatlantic.com/ - Anonymous4 weeks ago
White showed sweat stains less than colors with the old, natural fabrics.........."less offensive" to sensitive folks back then. I'm surprised someone doesn't get upset about sweat and protest now . . . . it's probably racist and Trump's fault.
- Anonymous4 weeks ago
Traditional rules and is none distracting from the game. The guys are in white too.(not skirts though)
- BillandhiscatsLv 64 weeks ago
Because with a white skirt and the usual specified white knickers, it lessens the impact of a flash of contrasting tomorrows washing.
- 4 weeks ago
If you play at Wimbledon it Must be white
and Many Players show respect for the Tradition
- bluebellbkkLv 74 weeks ago
White tennis clothing is mandatory at Wimbledon. So it may be easier just to have most of your tennis outfits white.
- megalomaniacLv 74 weeks ago
Once upon a time all tennis players had to wear all white as part of the rules of tennis clubs. These "rules" have been relaxed slowly over time but that's why there is a bias towards white.