Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why doesn't "Harry Potter" feel like a Warner Bros. franchise?
Every Warner Bros. movie has that hood nonsense about it, and yes i prefer Woody Woodpecker and Tom and Jerry and Hanna-Barbera (cartoons that truly did rock) over "Looney Tunes"/"Merrie Melodies." But there's something about that movie that makes it seem more like a New Line, Universal, Disney, Fox, even Columbia movie. Why? I don't think Bugs Bunny or the Warner shield or trumpet music. The movie is cutesy. Now I hate the anti-autistic overtones of this movie. After all JK Rowling is a fan of anti-autistic Autism Speaks supporting Alfonso Cuaron, so I wanna punch both these jokes to their Latin race.
Is it perhaps due to the fact that this is a British production and Warner was not the original distributor?
1 Answer
- Steve GuyLv 64 weeks agoFavorite Answer
I agree with you, it did feel a lot more like a series new line would make. You're probably right, I think I've read before that WB originally wanted to make the movie animated and cover multiple books but Rowling refused and her people demanded more control. I mean yeah they were probably right to do that because everyone involved is now very wealthy.