now the democrats as looking considering adding 4 news Supreme court justices, why not 50, just to be safe?

Awwwww ...Stop yer bitchin’,little snowflake. Moscow Mitch threw her little hissy fit and blocked Justice Garland’s appointment during Obama’s last term in 2016 (Have you conveniently forgotten that already?) but then turned around and pushed through Barrett’s appointment during demented Donnie’s failed reelection bid (Knowing he was about to get TROUNCED in the election). But That was OK with you losers, wasn’t it? Of course it was. . Whenever it goes in your favor it’s OK. Whenever it doesn’t it’s a “stolen election” or “rigged” somehow, right?

The country is tired of you loser con artists always trying to stack the odds in your favor.... and that’s perfectly fine.... but when anybody else tries to do it then it’s not. Tired of how you react to losing your elections by trying to overthrow our gov’t And murdering capitol police officers.  You have nothing to say anymore. So cry all you want little snowflake. You’re now known as party of thugs, criminals and liars Here and abroad. Which is why your party will not be around in this country much longer

A 50-member court would probably be too large and unwieldy. But a 13-member court wouldn't be exceptionally large and it would potentially have some positive facts. First off, I'm more seats wood eventually reduce the conflict over Supreme Court appointments because anyone appointment would be less likely to cause a drastic change in the Court's jurisprudence. At the secondly, the expansion, which we should emphasize is not going to happen, wood be dressed the anti-democratic nature of the Supreme Court that's currently constituted. The Democratic party has won the popular vote in each of the last 8 presidential elections except for 2004. And yet six of the nine Supreme Court justices have been appointed by Republicans. Only one of those justices, Clarence Thomas, was appointed before Democrats went on this remarkable winning streak. There's a real problem when the court is so out of sync with the will of the people and expanding the court would help redress this imbalance. It would particularly the important since part of the imbalance has been caused by Republicans ignoring past president and the stealing a nomination from Barack Obama.

There's not enough chairs for 50 to fit around the bench, so it'll have to be just 4.  And they absolutely MUST do this!

If the commission recommends adding more, we will have to consider it. 

Democrats are mad they don’t have a single party state yet. 

If Democrats do this, it will ruin the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. 

Where the hell did you hear that?

I know. The Constitution should mean what 5 people say it does, not 7, that would be stupid.

I don't see it going anywhere,,

Appeal to Extremes.

This logical fallacy occurs when a premise or conclusion is taken to an extreme that was not intended by the person who originally stated the premise or conclusion. This is a type of the extension fallacy which is a type of straw man argument. It is similar to the fallacy of slippery slope in that they both use emotion to extrapolate beyond what is reasonable.