Chris

Now that he's going into full campaign mode, beating down businesses, threatening even more spending, demanding tax hikes, and generally acting like a liberal, How long can the country withstand his rhetoric?

Every American is being forced to pay for Obama's black campaign bus and his campaign stops around the country.

So, why calls for Israel to go back to pre-1967 boarders? If it's because historically it belonged to the Palestinians, how about we go back even farther? Lets go back to 1135 Kingdom of Jerusalem boarders. The Siege of Jerusalem displaced those poor people. Their ancestors should have the right of return. :P

Heck lets go back to 1000BC boarders in the region. We'll create the countries of Edom, Moab, Aram, and Ammon. There will be no Palestine, Egypt will loose most of it's land, it'll be great, right? Makes total sense.

It's clear Liberals don't consider this an American Victory, but theirs alone. Will they try to gloat and milk this for a year and a half?

They insist on calling Tea Party goers tea baggers, so it's only fair right?

They insist on calling Tea Party goers tea baggers, so it's only fare right?

I'll agree that the stupid Birther issue was toxic to Republicans, but if you think Obama scored big, why didn't he hold off on it? As it stands, this will knock out the weaker candidates and be forgotten before next years election.

He donated 50K to Rahm Emanuel's

He was on the left for most social issues

He was a registered Democrat until 2009

So, why is he running as a Republican? Is he trying to poison Republican chances, or is he just egotistical?

So, the 1st amendment supposedly proclaims that there must be separation of church and state right? Based on this: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof."

Ok then, READ THE WHOLE FIRST AMENDMENT.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

So, if there's separation of church and state, does that also mean:

Separation of Free Speech and state?

Separation of The Press and state?

Separation of Assembly and state?

Separation of Redress of Grievances and state?

So, you can't teach journalism in schools? Government can't promote free speech? Can't have an assemble on state grounds? Can't have grievances in court?

Why is Religion the only one of the 5 rights called out as being the one restricted while the others are, in the same amendment, are protected?

It's clear that Nuclear Weapons are dangerous, but their effect is localized. For example, Hiroshima was destroyed and killed a lot of people, but it was just one city and it was rebuilt after the war and people can live there once again.

A bioweapon, on the other hand, if a single weapon was set off in a city could potentially devastate, not only an entire country, but multiple countries. Fleeing people spreading the possible plague farther and farther. The long term effect of such a weapon could kill people for decades where a Nuclear weapon is really only a one shot deal. Worse than that, it's far easier to set off a bioweapon than use a Nuke. A single carrier could start it rather than having to sneak device in or fire off missiles that could be shot down.

Given all this, why does Obama promising not to use a Nuclear weapons on a country that uses a bioweapon on us make any sense? It seems getting hit by a Nuke would be preferable to getting hit by a bioweapon.