(the) Trevor

Obama has limited his attacks to Republicans and has given the failures of Pelosi and Reid a complete pass. To me this indicates that he only wants to change things to that of the status quo of Democrats. A half change if you will towards the 9% approval rating of the Democrat Congress.

Meanwhile, McCain has attacked both the Repubs and the Democrats. Thus, to me, it seems that is real change.

Rasmussen released a poll indicating 70% of people feel the media tries to help candidates get elected rather than reporting on the candidate. Additionally, the poll shows a 5:1 bias for Obama over McCain. Seeing as how this same media is blowing the lipstick on a pig comment out of context; how do you think our next VP, Sarah Palin, would handle a moose with lipstick?

Carol Fowler seems to think it is a credential for a woman running for office not to have an abortion. Certainly, this is a perfect example of the anger that the left venomously spreads without reason or logic. But, if her statement is to be taken in context, who believes in that train of thought?

Obama talks about phony outrage perhaps because he is of the only party that represents pure anger. No matter what you say to a Democrat there is always an angry response or a “guns and God”-type response. It seems that even if the Democrats won the presidential election, all seats in Congress, and placed every single Supreme Court Justice that they would still not have an iota of ability to express anything other than anger. Please, tell me where I am wrong here.

I imagine they have at least one token soldier, but I have yet to confirm this.

The United States shot down a mini-van sized spy satellite traveling at 22,000 miles per hour, from a boat. Don't you think the missile defense system would have no problem hitting a big old cold war era Russian nuke.