Chris K

The Special Court Martial occurred sixteen years ago in March of 1997 while serving in the United States Marine Corps. I was charged with Larceny of an automobile and damage to non-military property. The original sentence handed down was a reduction in rank from E-3 to E-1, $1800.00 fine, Bad Conduct Discharge and 4 months confinement. However, the Convening Authority intervened and the charges were reduced to “wrongful appropriation” of a Motor Vehicle. The sentence that was adjudged was 30 days in military confinement and an Honorable Discharge. Had I know the severity of the consequences for my actions, I would never have taken part in using this military vehicle for recreational purposes. I remained out of trouble for the remainder of my military career and I received my Honorable Discharge from the United States Marine Corps July of 1999.

Is there a way to explain this on a job application, to make it not sound so bad considering I still received an honorable discharge?

Please help me answer the below question involving large scale military deployments.

The UN is developing plans for a future peace-keeping mission in Somalia and a Mission Support Concept was developed earlier this year. Assuming the Government of Nepal has pledged to provide a complete Brigade Group consisting of three infantry battalions supported by a Supply & Transport Company, a Maintenance Company, a tactical helicopter squadron, an Engineering Squadron, a Level 2 Medical Hospital and a Signals Platoon, please describe, in one page or less, how you would deploy this Brigade Group, listing your assumptions and critical factors.

If I was convicted of a special court martial do I need to list the information while applying for a government (usps) job? Note: I was convicete of a crime by special court martial but still received an honorable discharge at the end of my service.

What is a quasi contract?

AT 7:30am on April 28, Bruce went to Sally's warehouse where Sally gave Bruce an open crate containing 100 pints of strawberries. Bruce drove back to his fruit stand and put the strawberries on display. While waiting for the lunch hour rush of customers, Bruce noticed that most of his pint baskets of strawberries contained more than 15 strawberries. As Bruce knew from his college courses in Agricultural Management, the size standard for Grade A strawberries is 10-13 per pint. Accordingly, these strawberries were Grade B strawberries. At 11:45am, Bruce picked up the phone and called Sally "Take back your Grade B strawberries, they're not Grade A, you crook!" Sally mumbled about "caveat emptor" and hung up on Bruce.

If Bruce wants to pursue a cause of action against Sally, may he bring an action in court, or is he bound to pursue Sally in an arbitration proceeding? explain.

(Caveat Emptor means buyer beware - A buyer has a duty to protect himself)

Bruce Buyer wishes to purchase strawberries from Sally Seller:

Bruce faxes Sally on April 26, he offers to purchase 100 pints of strawberries at a price of $0.49 per pint.

April 27, Sally agrees to his purchase price and states "in the event of any dispute between us, it is agreed that the dispute will be resolved not in court, but rather, by arbitration under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association."

Shortly after receiving this fax from Sally, Bruce discovered that Robin was selling strawberries for $0.47 a pint. Bruce would now like to buy the strawberries from Robin rather than Sally.

If Bruce refuses to buy the strawberries from Sally, will this constitiute breach of an enforceable contract? explain.

Investment Properties, Inc., hires commercial Construction Company (CCC) to renovate the interior of Investment's office building. CCC submits plans that Investment approves. CCC completes the major reconstruction, paints the interior, and buys the fixtures and funishing. Investment rejects some of the furnishings because they do not match the plans, and subsequently refuses to allow CCC to finish the work or to collect payment. Could CCC sue succesfully for payment for the entire contract?

On May 1, Local Cartage Company and Modern Computers, Inc., orally agree that Local Cartage will pick up from National Chip Corportation and deliver to Modern Computers' manufacturing plant a certain number of computer chips on each Monday in the month. Under the agreement, Modern Computers will pay for the delivery services on June 1. On May 1, is this contract express, implied in fact or implied in law? On May 31, after all of the deliveries have been made, is the contract executed or executory?

Quest Resources, Inc., contracts with Ring Communications Corporation (RCC) for RCC to design and build an all- weather communications system for Quest's field operations. RCC builds the system, but it functions effectively only in good weather. Is this a breach of the contract? If so, what remedies does Quest have?

Investment Properties, Inc., hires commercial Construction Company (CCC) to renovate the interior of Investment's office building. CCC submits plans that Investment approves. CCC completes the major reconstruction, paints the interior, and buys the fixtures and funishing. Investment rejects some of the furnishings because they do not match the plans, and subsequently refuses to allow CCC to finish the work or to collect payment. Could CCC sue succesfully for payment for the entire contract?

On May 1, Brand Name Industries, Inc. (BNI), sent carol a letter, via overnight delivery, offering to employ her to to audit BNI's financial statements for the current year for $1,000. In the letter, BNI stated that Carol had ten days to accept. On May 5, Carol sent BNI a fax that stated, "The price for the audit seems to low. Would you consider paying $1,200?" BNI received the fax. The next day, Dan offered to conduct the audit for $800. On learning of Dan's offer, Carol immediately emailed BNI, agreeing to do the work for $1,000. BNI received this email on May 7. Explain why BNI and Carol do, or do not, have a contract.

On May 1, Local Cartage Company and Modern Computers, Inc., orally agree that Local Cartage will pick up from National Chip Corportation and deliver to Modern Computers' manufacturing plant a certain number of computer chips on each Monday in the month. Under the agreement, Modern Computers will pay for the delivery services on June 1. On May 1, is this contract express, implied in fact or implied in law? On May 31, after all of the deliveries have been made, is the contract executed or executory?

Solve for x: log5 x + log5 (x-4) = log5 12

is the answer: a) 4 b) 5 c) 6 d) 7

please list the steps for solving..

thank you

is the answer a). 5x+6y=19 b). 5x-6=y c). -x+4y=15 d). 4x+5y= -1

please list the steps for solving this equation..

thank you

is the answer a). 5x+6y=19 b). 5x-6=y c). -x+4y=15 d). 4x+5y= -1

please list the steps for solving this equation..

thank you