Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Lv 55,094 points

shoshidad

Favorite Answers28%
Answers899
  • California Red Light Photographic Ticket?

    I need citations to statutes or case law to fight a red light ticket issued on a report from an automatice photographic taking sensor, in Los Angeles, California.

    Specifically, I would like to know any authority pro or con regarding the photographs, sensor reports, etc. being introduced into evidence over a hearsay objection and/or a lack of foundation objection.

    I am a retired attorney so I know how to put on the case, I just need to find out how the prosecution thinks it can get the report generated by the system into evidence when no one was there when the picture was taken, and the witness certainly will not be anyone who designed the system.

    3 AnswersLaw & Ethics2 decades ago
  • Allergic reaction to leather watch band.?

    I have a wonderful watch, a gift, which has a leather band. I get an allergic reaction to it. Is there anything I can do to the band that will eliminate the allergic reaction? I know I can have the band changed, I would like to keep the original band if I can.

    4 AnswersSkin Conditions2 decades ago
  • How does a ban on homosexual marriage "defend" heterosexual marriage?

    During the recent "debate" in Congress any number of Republicans stated that they were "defending" marriage. I don't see how preventing homosexuals from having the same rights given heterosexuals "defends" or "protects" marriage. Are current rights and obligations of married people towards each other going to change if gays get married? Are the current benefits married couples received going to be reduced if gays get married?

    One justification given is that marriage is the best way of raising children and that "procreation" needs to be protected. Both of these seem to be non-sequiters. If marriage is best for children, then it should be expanded so that the hundreds of thousands of children being raised by their gay or lesbian parents can have a two-parent household. "Procreation" seem to be way off the mark, first no state has ever limited marriage to persons who intended to or even were capable of procreation. Its the one procreating without marriage that are the problem.

    12 AnswersLaw & Ethics2 decades ago
  • Looking for a good digital camcorder. Suggestions?

    My analog camcorder has died, and so I need to upgrade. I mainly use it to record family events and do not want to invest too much money in one. I would like model names and numbers and approximate retail prices. If you know of a good web-based retailer, I'd appreciate that also.

    4 AnswersCamcorders2 decades ago