NathanCoppedge

Evil might be one of the problems it encounters. What are other problems? Are there problems that are not evil? Is evil necessarily only one of the topics, perhaps the most serious? Is there a topic for problems that is more serious than evil?

Specifically, theories of meaning. Be as original as you like. I can invent theories whenever I want. This time I want to hear your opinion, instead of theories inside my head.

The more information the better.

Is this just my prejudice? Isn't it true that a morality without creativity is unthinking?

What if you lived the life of an immortal, and it was a natural extension of your current life. Describe what is absurd or else predictable about your life as an immortal.

Bonus: How do you make your immortal life worth living?

I want to award points to the most interesting / impressive metaphysical system.

If you can state an old system in a new way, that would be good too.

I prefer originality, and I don't dote on religion very much.

My background is Unitarian Universalist, college town, schizophrenia and the avant-garde, but also Jung and ascetic hedonism.

I think I found a way to collapse n categories into a number of deductions equal to the root of n.

The method might be useful for reaching aphoristic statements. It might be used for a new form of information philosophy, emotional interface design, or calculators that compute common-sense statements. The writing builds on my previously published philosophy book, The Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit.

Here is the link for those that are interested:

http://www.hypercubics.blogspot.com/2013/06/a-more...

(The earlier blog post explains the method in more detail).

I would welcome any comments readers have.

1. Do you agree this might be a viable system?

2. Is the system confusing?

3. Is the system constructive?

4. Is there a logical flaw?

5. What do you think?

6. Applications in logic or ethics?

Say, what would Epicurus say? Or what is the quality you seek in wine? Or what makes you think you can hold in your meal at any given time?

I recommend this book for its vast intelligence. Has anyone read it?

Sometimes going by the pseudonym Eucaleh or E. Terrapin

Here are several web links:

http://www.impossiblemachine.com/poetry.html

http://www.geocities.com/drypress/PoetryMain.html

Does this show that answers are unattainable, or conversely that truth is complicated?

Explain your sense of the meaning of that process, in as many words as possible. Is it technological? Is it rational? Can it be idealistic? What's wrong with it? Is it scientific? Does it have a specific idea of how to get it done? Is there a system? Are some levels better than others? Is it better to extend it, to go only to level one or level two, or level four?

What does your specific answer say about your specific process?

In other words, does the conventional equation for momentum require only one of its two elements?

We already know that conventionally the equation is Momentum = Mass * Velocity

It took some work, but an answerer agreed with me at: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AosL....

We also know that photons don't conventionally have mass:

Consider the previous answer at:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AosL....

If the equation can be fulfilled in one way, then logically it could be fulfilled in another way,

For example, an object tethered on a slope has no velocity, but it is the mass of the object that causes it to pull on the tether. Perhaps this is momentum without velocity, even to some minds, without force? Anyone agree with me?

I'm interested in detailed but very conventional explanations of how this MIGHT work AT ALL

Be careful not to conflate velocity with force. Velocity is NOT force.

Does anyone agree with the previous answerer at:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ai9Wd... ?