brich_inc

I am currently registered in a few web sites for online dating, and all I am looking for is just sex. I write only to women who have explicitly stated that they want a one night stand. My problem is I am not sure what to write? Any tips or even templates are welcome. And I would also be grateful if you would state whether you PM to her has worked or not. Thank you.

This may sound like a strange question but I am looking for a title of a TV show which I watched when I was little but I can't remember its name.

I think its run was in the early 90's possibly the late 80's. It was mainly about prostitutes. I never really got the idea of it I just remember some disturbing scenes from the series. For example in the end of one episode there was an old man tied up to a bed with his tummy exposed. Suddenly there is a sound from a boiling kettle and a black prostitute comes in her underwear holding that kettle. She says something to the man, he start begging for mercy but she just pours the boiling water on his stomach. There was a couple of lesbian prostitutes that kept a man in their basement tied to a wooden cross, and one of them went down and broke the man's nose or something like.

Anyway, I know that such a movie does exist so if anyone can please help me identify it, I would be very grateful.

Thank you.

Can you please explain to me the evolution of 3D animation graphics? I mean can you align chronologically every animated movie that has set a benchmark in 3D graphics and exactly what was revolutionary about it? For instance: Toy Story (1995) - The first ever 3D motion picture; Shrek (2001) - The first animation to use global illumination and a physics engine; Final Fantasy VII (2005) - Surface scattering, ambient occlusion, photon mapping and more complex scenes than ever (explain what you mean by scene complexity if included) etc. There are many other movies between them but neither of them is revolutionary so that's why they are not on the list. This is only an example of course I leave the real information to you. Also please include if the amount of detail has evolved as well - increased texture size, more polygonal count etc. If you can not answer the question fully and correctly please guide me to a more specialized forum that can and will.

Thank you all :)! Peace

You see a very, very close friend of mine made a drawing. And because she knows I am interested in art she gave it to me and now I plan on returning the favor. But since I want this to be an on going circle I want to write on the back of my drawing "You're it (wink)". But I don't know what kind of a wink it should be. It can't be simply a ;). Please think of something simple yet original. The best design will get the best answer and it will be used as a reference. My profile at DA is at bor1s.deviantart.com so feel free to send me a PM.

Thank you.

Have they not reached some sort of limit in your opinion? Or are they getting more and more photo-realistic every year?

P.S. If your answer to the first question is YES then please tell me why you think so-because technology can't go any further or because the effects are perfect?

Thank you.

I still can't decide between Peanut and Achmed because there are only two videos of Achmed. But I think that I like Achmed best.

OK check this out.I have a 2448x3072 picture and I want to print it at 1440 dpi on a 8x10 photo paper using the best settings possible. But at 1440 dpi the image should be by default about 1.8x2.2. So my question is how can I make it bigger (8x10) without pixelization? I know it will be blury because when I encreaae the pixels I know I get new ones bu they don't add detail I just want to know how to stretch without losing any detail or having a pixelized image?

Thank you!

For digital photos ofcourse.And by difference I mean what do you need for the one and the other and the differences in the results.

I am not asking which method do you prefer to use but which is most pleasing for the eye in your opinion.

1)Cell-shading

2)Soft-shading

3)Painted with brush strokes (I don't know the exact technical term)

I remind you that this is about cartoon/comix type of illustrations-not realistic.Mine is soft-shading.

I am sorry but I couldn't find his name in the Internet.Anyway what is so great about him that he got that award.I mean the character design is poor-they look flat and siproportionate.

I have been in all kinds of forums ever since 2004 and I have never reported an user until now.I'm just tired of asking a question and someone just answers something stupid that has no connection to the matter what so ever.I reported that user but since no one else is probably going to report him I am only losing "points".This sucks!Whenever some one complains a moderator or an admin should look it up an judge.If you were wrong you should lose points and if not you should gain.It's not fair.It's like I am getting busted for doing my dutty and making ansewrs a better place.If someone just stood up to that they would stop!

Thank you.

I don't know exactly how long did the porduction take but it must be atleast 6 months.OK that's 101min for 6 months with almost 150 artists working on it(animatiors,inkers,painters,CG artists).On the other hand Yu-Gi-Oh! GX generates 24 episodes which is over 430min with arround 30 animators.How is that possible?I mean sure,VHDB looks better than GX but not that much.

I am not asking for the plot or something my question is wheather there are any improvements in the animation in any of the series and what exactly-shading,effects,polygon increase or maybe textures?

OK I'm confused and I hope you won't consider this a stupid question and actually shed some light on the subject.I read that Onimusha:Warlords's character are built from 10,000 polygons.The game was realeased for PS2 in 2001 and for PC in 2003.On the other hand there's DooM 3 which had bigger sys. reqs but still the characters were made from 6800 polygons.Plus PCs are supposed to be faster than consoles yet Lair's character are built from 50,000 polygons.This statements put together make no sence at all.Am I missing something or are some of the numbers incorrect?

Thank you.

Some people think that dpi and ppi are all the same...well they are not!PPI is from 4 to 6 times less than DPI which means that in order to print one pixel you need 4-6 dots.But that's for standarts printing.Does the dpi=ppi rule apply for photo printing...I mean does 300 dots per inch mean that there are actually 300 pixels per inch on the photo?

P.S.Are there some books,comix or art-albums printed that way?

I mean A4 sized pages of course.Should I just set it to a very high dpi mode or should I just click on some "grain-free" option?

P.S.Can all new printers do that?

And if a photo is grain-free(whatever that means) does it mean that on paper it will have no detail los compared to the original RAW image?

I mean they are both 100% 2D and they have the same resolution,colour depth and fps.