Eustuff

CITY Peace officer whom was under Inter-local Agreement fabricated civil infraction and criminal traffic ticket weeks after an event in city limits. The court had initially dismissed everything. Then, officer re-filed them (not felony) again with COUNTY court, not CITY.

My claim as third party intervener, authorized representative, is that the NAME in tickets, and COMPLAINT does not match NAME on driver's license. An interlocutory appeal was filed based on this fatal error months before trial. The court was repeatedly confronted on requirement to penalty parameters such as fines, and demand for fees, thus defining "dollars" and the symbol "$" as in Statute and court rule.

The court repeatedly refused to answer and define money.

The court issued 10 months of appearances under threats of arrest, and denied due process at every possible moment.

Basically, to secure the prosecution a recognizance or Bond is constructed by officer Certification and filing with court CLERK in order book recognizing a Defendant to the court. If that debt obligation is not immediately "paid" then default is entered. If FTA occurs then judgment and forfeiture is entered, usually as WARRANT for arrest. etc etc

No acceptance of liability as to Defendant was made, no plea (not guilty or guilty) was even made by third party intervener, and court was told that, "No, the violations of Statute are not understood!"

Hence, I am stating that since the original AFFIDAVIT as police report was NAMING the wrong "person" and was full of other untruths, then all that follows is also in ERROR. The job of Appeals court is to review errors of trial court.

Transmittal of record demands $40, but THEY have failed to define money.

Will Appeals court review case without fee and also recognize ERROR in Charging document?

Yet, every single 14th amendment "person" must voluntarily choose to be found within the District of Columbia or "a" territory (possession) of the United States in order to be prosecuted in the courts. Further, all courts are lower district federal courts, where their authority is only in District of Columbia or "a" territory of the United States. There are two simultaneous jurisdictions in each State: one is union of the State (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1); the other is the federated STATE, "a" possession of the United States (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2). A "person" (fictitious) is found in the latter when they voluntarily disclose a social security number.

Those that appear as themselves and have accessed the law, are feared by judges, prosecutors, and even defense attorneys. Are they afraid their precious deceptive monopoly will be exposed?