dagiffy

A racist bigot man, Barak Obama, and his equally racist wife attend the church of a racist black supremacist hate-monger for 20 years, ride the media wave to the White House. The racist president nominates a blatantly racist woman to the highest court in the land...and no one calls him on it except for a few sheepish senators? No articles in the NY Times? Newsweek? Time? Washington Post? Has the PC Police gotten everyone cowed into being terrified of pointing out the obvious? Has anyone even read Michelle "The Bigot" Obama's racist thesis paper, which you can easily find online? Why is it that everyone but European Americans can be racist and get away with it?

After all, these people are killing, and have been killing, day after day after day after day. They take hostages, saw their very heads OFF their shoulders, tape the gruesome act and post it to the internet. They brainwash children to think it's noble to wear a dynamite suit and blow themselves up, hoping to take as many innocent people as possible with them. Wild eyed Muhammad freaks are THE scourge of planet earth right now. They don't understand anything but kill or be killed.

Why are so many people thinking they can placate these savages with land, with deals, with soothing words? They kill people. That's what they do. And that's what they'll do to YOU if they could get their hands on you. You might even be one of the lucky ones who gets your head sawed off while the internet community watches.

Why is most of the world trying to placate these people like Chamberlain did with Hitler? And with similar results?

Take an extremist like Michael Moore, a bleeding hearted liberal. The labels I've seen are "visionary", "talented", and "activist". Or Al Franken..."extremely intelligent". Or Al Gore..."intelligent" (ha! look into his college grades!), "thoughtful", "passionate", etc. You get the picture.

Now for some poor-people-hating conservative extremists, like Pat Buchanan. I've seen "Hitler", "dictator", "hate monger", etc. Rush Limbaugh is many things, including "blowhard", "controversial", "hate monger", "divisive". You get the picture?

Now, given that a out of 79 journalists working for the three major networks, 78 of them are registered Democrats who are either now active or were active in Democratic campaigns at some level, can we see a pattern emerging? The exception is Diane Sawyer, who was Nixon's press secretary.

Bias? Not this media, no way! The labels given by the bleeding hearted liberal media are deserved, not biased...

what do you think?

When in fact his opponent, Albert Gore, was also a C student and also an ivy leage grad but went on to fail 5 of 8 classes in grad school? Why did the bleeding hearted liberal media insist over and over that Gore had won Florida when he hadn't, and after 5 total recounts Bush won Florida every time and THIS wasn't reported? Why when Bill Clinton invaded his foreign country to oust his pet peeve dictator, Milosevic, not one bleeding hearted liberal put on their sandals to march for peace, yet when Bush invaded his country to oust HIS pet peeve dictator, the bleeding hearted liberal rage was white hot, every sandal in town was marching, and all the bleeding hearted liberal networks were on board?

No bias? Hardly. What do you think?