BiteFighter

if mayweather has a fighting style like pacquiao and achieve what pacquiao has achieved (gaining so much weight with out losing his skills)..will they accuse him of using steroids too?

Sorry if I'm very late with this issue...I just didn't saw their match nor heard any news about their fight..What happen to those 2 guys???

Bob M--

Not yet. If he beats mayweather then yes. Think about what would happen if he loses to mayweather. Mayweather would be considered one of the greatest of all times. Manny would still be great but the idea of Manny being on of the greatest of all times wouldnt go through alot of peoples minds.

So if we follow your Point Mr Bob M..Shouldnt be Felix Trinidad recognized as one of the greatest boxer instead of Dela Hoya..Coz he defeated him(Dela Hoya) during his prime.(But still Dela Hoya was still recognized as one of the greatest boxer of all time)...Coz I think your trying to Point out that..One defeat on Pacman and he'll not be considered anymore as one of the greatest boxer of all time..

he's the only boxer aside from Dela Hoya to have won championship in 6 different division(only the 2 of them has that record) ..Does he deserve now to be recognize as one of the greatest boxer of all time?

Many are saying these excuses during the win of pacquiao against these boxers "Diaz was a Rated b boxer" , "Morales,Barrera,Marquez and Dela Hoya not on their Prime" ...Now, what's your excuse why hatton was beaten by pacman?

Critics always ask will manny wins if he fights against those far much larger and heavier fighter than him..Then I'll ask this question to them.

Not the trainer gives up for the boxer. But the boxer himself.Because You seldom see boxers surrender.They fight with pride and passion.Is it harder for a boxer to destroy the pride and passion for the fight of the his opponent than to knock out him?Because I also saw boxers who are kOed but still wants to fight the referee just did'nt allow it.

Beaten Barrera and Diaz on their Prime.Beaten legends like Dela Hoya and Morales.Maybe not convincingly against marquez.But will that single fight against marquez nullifies all pacquiao's achievements on his fight?

This is what I want to ask to the critics about pacquiao. Let's say marquez wins against pacman? and stole the limelight out from him? What's next? Will there be a marquez vs diaz Fight? will there be even a possibility of OLDH or Hatton or Mayweather vs marquez fight? I don't think so. This questions might had come up in the minds of judges before they decide who'll win against pacman and marquez. Just what other critics say that the win of pacman is a "gift" for him.According from an article of yahoo sports, they said that the sports of boxing is dying because of the new and much more exciting MMA of UFC, Many audiences of boxing are now much likely to watch MMA than boxing. So I think the judges made a PRACTICAL decision. To save the sports of boxing.Because what will happen if the most exciting boxer right now will be defeated by a nearly retiring boxer?What will be the next offer the boxing can give the fans?There are new promising boxers out there but not as exciting as pacman is right now.What I'm trying to say is that the sports is dying and the promoters needs a boxer who will catch the attention of more audience.And right now,pacman is the one who's catching the attention in the world of boxing.

This is the common critics asked about the win of pacman against Dela Hoya. Full of "what if's" Let's say Oscar is 25 yrs old right now and fight pacquiao, do you think he can win against pacquiao? Also IF pacquiao has the same height and body physique like ODLH and the speed and agility is still the same for pacman?What you think? especially those who say pacman only won because ODLH is old.