Tim

make a donation to tea partier Chris McDaniel's campaign?

"Tea Partier Chris McDaniel has taken $800 in donations from Carl Ford, a former lawyer for Sam Bowers, the imperial wizard of the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan who died in prison after being convicted of the murder of civil rights activist Vernon Dahmer. Ford also is active in the League of the South, a neo-Confederate organization that has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, and was active in the Klan in Laurel, Mississippi, in the early 1960s."

No matter how hard you cons try to claim that us liberals are the racist ones...not you, just know that you are fooling no one. Everyone knows how bigoted you are, including yourself. And you're attempts to dodge blame by putting it back on us are sad and laughable.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/17/t...

The inevitable collapse of the western antarctic ice shelf that could cause up to a 13 ft rise in sea level is being reported in many different reputable news sources. Time, The Daily Beast, Newsweek, The New York Times, etc. Why is this story NOWHERE to be found on f o x news. com? Is it because it would throw a monkey wrench into their steady stream of disinformation that they feed their mouth breathing lackey "viewers?" Or is it because facts and c0ns don't mix? Maybe they haven't figured out a way to blame o b a m a yet?

This is just what you cons have been waiting for! Here, us libs will help you pack if it means you'll get out faster.

http://en.ria.ru/crime/20130611/181617271.html

I understand you may not like their methods (I personally don't like the Tea party methods but i digress) but what exactly do you have against their message? Are you for unlimited corporate greed? Are you pro the wall street that nearly destroyed America? I don't understand the thinking here. And if you say something like "they don't have jobs" I would like to inform you that is not a legitimate answer and i also will look down on you for not being smart enough to actually answer the question.

asking a question to michele Bachman saying "tell congressman paul why he is wrong to want to try terrorists in civilian court." WTF. They've been asking questions like this all night. i'm a lib and it really seems like they are trying to bury him. i don't get it, is there a real conspiracy against this guy?

look i'm not going to name any specifics...you all know what happened. all cons say is "let's not make this a political issue" and "we have nothing to do with what happens in norway" etc. Agreed, no one in the USA had anything to do with this but if american cons had norwegian relatives this guy would be your first cousin. then you see the timothy mcveigh's and the tea partier at the rand paul rally who beat up a woman. A pattern starts to emerge. cons may think our ideas are dangerous (which is not true, but i digress) but cons are PHYSICALLY dangerous. they are capable and sometimes willing to commit horrid acts of violence. a pattern starts to emerge when you here about the extreme right doing these things over and over and over again. if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then in all likelihood it is a duck. Just admit it cons, this guy was a right winger who held many of the beliefs of yourselves. so why dodge the question when you yourselves know it to be true?

defense budget? Why do we need to spend 500 billion a year on our military? We have done this for years even when we weren't at war. why is no one suggesting we cut defense?

released they still aren't happy claiming it is a fake? They got what they were asking for, will anything make them happy? Why can't birthers finally stop beating this horse that has been dead for so long that it has fully decayed and is nothing but bones now?

It seems like half of all questions get deleted now. What gives? Do they really think we are all THAT sensitive? How am I going to sarcastically answer a tea partiers question if it gets deleted so quickly? BTW, libs and cons don't blame each other for this...we all know its both sides fault.

Not easily offended Liberal.

I would like to pretend in this hypothetical scenario that nukes had never been invented...so conventional weapons only. Who would have won? why do you think so?

Please be specific. Not something like "he is destroying America."

This really isn't meant to be a question about social conservatism at all, strictly economics. The bush era tax cuts being extended for the wealthiest americans will reduce unemployment by 0.1% to nothing at all. Thoughts from those who support the cut extension?

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/...

the following is a template that anyone can use to correctly follow the universally accepted guidelines for a question or response on YA. use as needed, and i hope people will leave comments including anything i may have left out.....enjoy!

make an oversharp disagreement based on unstated differences in paradigms. Nazi analogy employed, followed by sharp comment about the lack of education of someone who replied, misspelled of coarse. Insistence that since everyone ignored my point, all must concede the correctness thereof. Assumption based on this that opponents are either morally or mentally defective, or both. Enraged accusation of disloyalty to the national community. Sweeping declaration that blogger wishes for the terrorists to win. Demand to know ”whose side your on.” Cryptic comment about day of reckoning, and who won’t be laughing then. Watch-this-if-you-can-handle-facts link to Glenn Beck or Keith Olbermann. Accusation that YA proprietor has maliciously blocked me in a fit of hypocritical censorship. Use of one or more of these phrases: ”What are you afraid of?”, ”Down the memory hole”, ”You can dish it out but can’t take it”, etc. Cryptic, inexplicable drive-by trolling that references and misinterprets a statement made months ago. Unhinged name-calling, insinuations of totalitarianism. Vaguely relevant one-sentence comment offered in the spirit of contradicting the original post. Closing statement in spirit of VERMIN LIBERALS or SELFISH, HEARTLESS CONSERVATIVES.

This is what I have to say, I will make an oversharp disagreement based on unstated differences in paradigms. Nazi analogy employed, followed by sharp comment about the lack of education of someone who replied, misspelled of coarse.

Insistence that since everyone ignored my point, all must concede the correctness thereof. Assumption based on this that opponents are either morally or mentally defective, or both. Enraged accusation of disloyalty to the national community. Sweeping declaration that blogger wishes for the terrorists to win. Demand to know ”whose side your on.” Cryptic comment about day of reckoning, and who won’t be laughing then. Watch-this-if-you-can-handle-facts link to Glenn Beck or Keith Olbermann. Accusation that YA proprietor has maliciously blocked me in a fit of hypocritical censorship. Use of one or more of these phrases: ”What are you afraid of?”, ”Down the memory hole”, ”You can dish it out but can’t take it”, etc. Cryptic, inexplicable drive-by trolling that references and misinterprets a statement made months ago. Unhinged name-calling, insinuations of totalitarianism. Vaguely relevant one-sentence comment offered in the spirit of contradicting the original post. Closing statement in spirit of VERMIN LIBERALS or SELFISH, HEARTLESS CONSERVATIVES.

with?

fox news reporting then they get source after source of fox distorting the truth, to just admit that fox does lie? i looked at this question where somebody said show me a source and their were lots of examples. why do cons continue to insist that fox is fair and balanced when it is blatantly, obviously not?

for home defense? A little background first: I live in texas and you may or may not know this but in my state i have the right to shoot someone trespassing on my property after dark, no questions asked. The only problem is it is hard to hit someone from over 200 yards in the pitch black darkness. So i went to my local armory and asked for something with a little more stopping power than my AK-47.....something like an RPG or ideally a surface to surface missile system with night vision and infrared tracking system. sure i may end up killing the neighbors dog by mistake but i'm trying to make a point to all commie hippies who had the misfortune of wandering onto my land!!!! And they had the nerve to tell me I couldn't have that because its "illegal." So i said fine, can I at least have some anti-personnel landmines? Again, No. I want my second amendment rights dammit!!!!!!!

i ask for one thing only. if you are a con please don't say ronald reagan and if you are a lib don't say FDR or Obama. Please be creative, those are not creative answers.

now before i get a million rants saying how dumb i am hear me out. if the USSR still existed there wouldn't be the perpetual security problems with their nuclear weapons stockpile. China and russia are two of the world's fastest growing economies if china was still hardcore commie we wouldn't owe them a trillion dollars and our industries would be stronger than they are now because of less outsourcing. we would still be considered the unquestioned leader of the free world and other countries would look up to us for guidance and leadership. the USA and the USSR would both be jointly working in cooperation to defeat islamic extremism...they have a terrorism problem in russia also. anyone see why i say i miss communism?

is there a way to see a list of everyone who has blocked you?