Kevin

I can't imagine a much more politically damaging outcome for the GOP. Bills like the one in Alabama are so out of step with the mainstream that I can't see the GOP coalition (which includes upper middle class suburban Republicans who bite their tongue on social issues to avoid higher taxes) going along with this. Does the GOP realize how damning this would actually be to the party? It's one thing to give evangelicals lip service (which is all they usually do), but to pass what they want on this would be insane/political suicide.

The pro-slavery party.

The pro-segregation party.

The pro-lower standards for certain races party.

Now officially the pro-pandering to bigots to win party.

When will the Democrats change their racist ways?

Curry's great. He has 2 MVP's (no Finals MVP) and is unquestionably the best shooter in the game. He's playing hurt so it's not fair to judge him completely on this year's playoffs. However, if you take Curry off of the Warriors, they're still a championship caliber team. If you take LeBron off the Cavs, this year's team probably loses in the first round of the playoffs. In previous years he's taken teams that wouldn't even make the playoffs without him. Curry is the better shooter, but LeBron is better at everything else. He's just an all around beast. He's one of the best passers, rebounders, scorers, and defenders in the league.

Everyone I know is in shock. We all thought that the previous terrorist attack before Orlando was the last one and that the world was now in peace. None of us ever could have imagined another terrorist attack on US soil in our lifetimes. However, Trump called for one and deserves to be congratulated. How did you honor him?

I don't agree with Trump's Muslim ban, but I think he has the most coherent strategy as when to use force and when not to use force. I see it as similar to Bush 1's strategy. Unlike Obama, Trump says we should be willing to implement ground troops and excessive force to take out terrorist groups such as ISIS. However, unlike Bush 2 or Hillary, he's not into toppling dictators who pose no serious threat to the US such as in Iraq or Libya. He wisely realizes this leads to instability rather than a functional democracy. Hillary is a hawk and I would be worried about her trying to topple Assad when there's clearly nothing that can come in and take his place. Meanwhile, 3rd party candidates like Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are waiting for ISIS to attack us before we do anything to take them out. This "let them attack us first" philosophy is even dumber than an expensive hawkish foreign policy. I don't want terrorist organizations to grow so that they can plot another large scale attack on us like 9/11.

Compared to most libertarians he's pragmatic and reasonable. From my understanding he isn't calling for the privatization of all roads or legalizing the sale of meth to minors. However, his foreign policy is questionable at best. He says that we make problems worse by going over to the Middle East and only attack if we're attacked. Attacking only if we're attacked is idiotic thinking. As the most powerful country in the world, we should attack if there's a legitimate threat to attack us. What are we going to do? Wait for somebody to nuke us and then go after them hard? We should be blasting ISIS back to the stone age right now, not waiting for them to attack us. I think most reasonable agree that our experiments of removing dictators, nation building, and creating democracies have been epic disasters, but we should not let up on attacking terrorists wherever they are.

I eat all kinds of meats. I think it's only fair that I return the favor and contribute my body to the circle of life. I don't care if its crows or crocodiles. I just hope that my body doesn't go to waste and something can use it for energy.

I'm not sure why we're making a big deal out of transgenders using certain bathrooms. This has never been a serious issue before.

I think Westbrook and CP3 are slightly better players than Harden, but he might compliment the team better in the starting 5, being a true SG.

That's the impression I'm getting from this highly intellectual debate.

I don't see any conservatives protesting Hillary or Bernie rallies. The only people who protest them are left-wing nuts as well.

That's effectively Hillary's position on guns. Even Bernie thinks she's a complete moron with her views on this.

None of these other clowns can top that. Might as well go home.

The real NH results that matter:

Hillary- 15/32 delegates

Sanders- 13/32 delegates

4/32 delegates still undecided

In Iowa she leads 27-21 despite it being a 50-50 tie. Sorry, Sanders fans, but he doesn't have a prayer.

Thanks liberals, you're so smart!

This is how we get things like the Obamacare website.