?

Where is the occupy White House movement?

Also, liberals, before you begin your loop of obfuscatory b.s., be mindful of the fact that both 0bama and his energy secretary have advocated for European levels of gas prices, to level the playing field for "cleaner energies".

There is no disputing the fact that, for the foreseeable future, the middle and poor class cannot afford expensive electric cars as well as the kits and batteries needed for them, and are relegated to use of gasoline and oil, and these higher prices are going to hurt these groups disproportionately, as fuel expenditures are constant among many, but vary drastically among income earners as a proportion of income.

Why the double standard? What say you, liberals?

Most liberals will not generate any sort of response to a question asked, but rather, will re-ask the question back to the original asker to make their own point.

How effective of a strategy is this?

Why is coherence such an alien concept to liberals?

The vast majority of liberal arguments stem merely from regurgitation of old arguments made years ago, or from talking points recited from liberal media sources.

The primary example is of course, that race has always accounted for 100% of the dissent for 0bama. Liberals cling to this like it is the only thing keeping them above water.

This argument got old about 2 years ago, yet it keeps being made. Are they blind to 0bama's incompetence, or just oblivious?

Is there a disconnect between the job requirements of President and the perceived core competencies of a Community Organizer?

Liberals like to dish out this accusation, however, when it comes time to present a specific quote that I have echoed, they are unable to do so.

Why is this? How can we view them with any credibility once they do this?

Liberals constantly complain about the United States and our living standards compared to the rest of the world. Yet they care so much about seeing other "mistreated" cultures of the world advance and spit on the U.S.

Yet, when it is politically advantageous for them, the fringe leftists decide to strike a chord with the American public by complaining about U.S. job outsourcing and pinning it on the opposition.

Inherently, however, a leftist believes that other cultures have been wronged and deserve some form of compensation for their wrongdoing at the hands of the evil U.S.A. So, outsourcing does exactly what they advocate. Yet, they complain and blame the right for it.

On what side of the fence can we conclude that they stand?

After campaigning year round across the country, isn't it a good for our leader to take a vacation?

For the past year, 0bama has proven unable, or otherwise incapable of presenting a stance on the important issues facing the country. As an example, there was no budget advanced before Republicans gained control of the house.

0bama has no long term plan to address our deficit and put us on a clear, concise path toward a balanced budget. He had no plan regarding the debt ceiling(unless you consider standing on the sidelines and voicing political talking points a plan).

0bama never advanced any substantive plan for addressing the debt ceiling. He simply deried the opposition's plans as irresponsible, most of the time, before finally caving in and signing the most recent agreement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9puGAMCAZU&feature...

Here's the actual quote.

Is this an example of the "liberal intellectualism" that I lack?

Is it because liberals are ill-equipped to handle the challenges of our time? Are they ill-equipped to come up with real solutions to balance our budget and get us on an economically sound path, or do they believe that spending money we don’t have forever is the answer?

When one considers just a mere handful of statements Mrs. Pelosi has made, the stupidity becomes evident.

Yet, Nancy Pelosi is not criticized for her stupidity and lack of understanding about comlex issues like someone like Palin is. Why is this?

Consider some of Pelosi's comments:

Unemployment benefits help to create jobs

We have to pass a bill to find out what is in it, outside of the fog cast over the bill by the media

The CIA lied to congress(after she sat through briefings by the CIA telling her EXPLICITLY what tactics were to be used to interrogate detainees)

AND best of all:

The tornado in Joplin has caused the unemployment rate to increase.

Or is this just a smokescreen attempt to hide what is otherwise recognized as the real culprit, liberal 0crat policies.

This is a very weak recovery at best, if you even call it a "recovery". The Reagan recovery was well underway by this point in his presidency.

It seems that any other president would be lambasted for the economic news, but this one constantly gets a free pass and constantly gets excuses made for him. Why is this?

I can recall in 2004, when we were coming out of a mild recession, all we heard about was how bad the economy was, now, with consistently bad economic news, all we hear is positive spinning and excuse making.

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spend.php?span...

0bama has expanded the scope and density of the war efforts, and defense spending is increasing under his regime.

Out of the 5 polls currently computed in the average, Fox News has the highest approval for 0bama. Is this an unequivocation of the network's liberal bias?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/pres...

Would you rather be erratic in your decision making, or worse, have a disposition for liberal 0cratic decision making?

Under which does one bear more of a deficiency?

Everytime 0bama is criticized, whether it has to do with policy or something else, they claim racism.

Criticize spending, they claim racism.

Make a comment about 0bama golfing too much, they claim racism.

Criticize 0bamacare, they claim racism. etc, etc, etc.