Destructor

I love how when a team loses someone always says, "well if it wasn't for that interception the game would have been closer." Or "If they hadn't made that stupid penalty then the score would have been tied at half time" Now I think this is just ridiculous, what about you peeps out there? Frankly i'm sick of this type of excuse, there are penalties for a reason and we all know what the consequenses are and it is in fact part of the game. I mean think about it, no one says, "Man if that quarterback just hadn't thrown those 3 touchdowns we wouldn't have lost." sounds stupid, right? well guess what, it sounds just as stupid to blame penalties or interceptions, or a QB getting sacked or any other what if, cause it ain't what if, if it actually happened. Only thing that counts on these terms is a seriouslly ill call that is way out of line and you can't do anything about it but listen to officials apologize 2 days to late.

I thought that would be the nail in her coffin, I guess I was wrong, and now it's just gonna take a little bit longer to get her out of the way, what a shame.

With all of the reports about both teams going into the game tonight, I am wondering why there are so many about how jim tressel is serious this year, I mean was he not serious last year? I think both teams are good and either team can win it (i'm a BR tiger fan). But It jsut seems silly to me, because i'm pretty sure he was serious last year, I know there is something to prove, but don't you have something to prove no matter how many times you go to a championship game, if you're there, you're there to prove you are the best, even if you've been 3 times in a row and won it all three times and your back for a fourth, or lost it last year, or are there for the first time in 4 years, you can say LSU has something to prove also, being the first 2 loss team, and winning an outright championship without a split decision, I know it's all fodder for the fire but, but they all have somehting to prove and I suspect tressel is not anymore serious than anyone else. I guess it's just media hype.

People keep talking about how this year sucked, but I thought it was great and that there were a large amount of close exciting games. And I also wonder why everyone wants a blowout. Of course I would love my team to win big all the time, but that is the security blanket for victory. In reality the best games are close and come down to the fourth quarter, who want to watch a blowout, that gets boring, like the georgia game. Why do you have to win by 30 plus to prove you're the best. It's like a hard fought game doesn't mean sh*t anymore, when in fact I think hard fough games mean more. USC and Georgia can't claim they deserve a shot at the title they whooped up on tw0 very mediocre teams, Illinois, yeah had a good year but come on, they are not that good, not USC calibre, and the Hawaii, come on, they got the gift for going undefeated and really who thought they had a chance against georgia, what does it prove when georgia kills a team who recruits players out of a flag fball league!

Am I picky if I have passed up the opportunity on occasion to be with people who I knew I could have sex with but was not attracted to in some way, either physically or mentally (one of these or a combination of the two). Or do you think these preferences possibly keep me out of potential drama.

Do you really care if a football team does not interview a minority coach (ole miss, Tex A&M) if it already knows who it want's to lead it's team. I don't think it's necessary and quite frankly I would be embarrased as a minority to think that the only reason I am being interviewed for the job is to appease a group of people, like a pawn in a chess game that you're not gonna win, In general why take the time to interview anyone of any color who you know you're not gonna hire. I think it's disrespectful, the Black Coaches Association is making tokens out of black coaches by using them to suffice it's agenda.

I have tried to change this in the settings, and I can get my name on my homepage to change, but when I email I still see my full name next to my address. Where do I go to fix this/How do I change it? I'm just not down with my name plastered accross the someones screen, especially if I'm involving myself in deviant matters, which I may or may not.