Nope

The political bank-and-forth that has shut down only a minuscule part of the country is reaching a fever pitch once again as the government is holding a water pistol at America's head. Democrats and Republicans will not make concessions on either side of the debate, and it looks like the President is stepping back and staying out of harms way. If the Republicans, who promised to fight again Obamacare want to make a statement, then it's probably a good time to bring the debate of impeachment to the House floor.

So, with that, should the House consider impeaching President Obama?

Everyone that got elected to Congress owes a thanks to the voters who put them there. Now they get to quarrel like children over funding this or that and blame each other if they can't get the job done. I've seen teenagers argue better than this.

So is it our fault if the government shuts down? If so, do we all have to hit ourselves at midnight eastern time?

We constantly rely on Republicans and Democrats for government control, but that methodology has crashed and burned every two years. Why do we continue to rely on them? Why even have political boundaries at all?

Should we abolish political parties altogether and vote on the individual instead?

Most kids coming out of High School more than likely slept through Social Studies, without any understanding of how the United States Government operates (both on and off the books). Both political parties constantly go after the younger voters with Dems winning the group in recent years. If it were the Republicans winning that group, it would probably be the same argument, except John McCain is president (Sarah Palin is VP, HA HA HA!) and we have a Democratic Congress (which would probably have been a good thing since Dems tend to roll over and avoid confrontation).

At the current voting age, most life experiences have yet to be had since life is just beginning. The only debt to be had will be realized in about four years, unless you decided to get one of those awesome credit cards that helps you buy anything below $10,000 and you have to get the stuff repossessed later.

So... increasing the voting age in the United States.... Yes or No, and why?

None of it affects me and it's always nice to see Washington drive each other insane every now and then. Why everyone tolerates this is beyond me, but to each his own, I guess.

If you are having a shutdown party tonight, what kind of snacks do you have? Which network countdown clock are you watching for the inevitable? Any alcohol involved? Speaking of which, wouldn't it be nice if we could have another beer summit when the government closes down for two days?

About once every year I ponder on this and try to get a feel of what the political climate on this section is by reviewing the Q & A posted. What's it like today? Still tearing each other's heads off about Obama, or have we moved on from that?

They're going out of business anyway, so all of that extra surplus caused by not paying wages should go to someone. Just think of it, we have so much money borrowed already that is going to just sit there until the Republicans get their way. This is America! How dare we not spend uncontrollable after October 1st!

2008 saw a lot of traffic, but when did it first actually impact the result of an election?

There are many, many, many more people in this country than there are Bureaucrats. Shouldn't we start thinking about charging the government for taxes due instead of the opposite?

Is it possible that Obama would go to such great lengths to secure his presidency for another four years, rather than battle it out with an actual Republican Candidate?

... each side's interpretation of Federal and State Law, including the U.S. Constitution?

What I am curious to find out is where the differences originate between the two sides whenever a new issue arises in the mainstream.

Thank you for your time.

I'm just curious to see what the attitude is from the Conservatives on Scott Brown putting in the crucial 'Yea' vote that passed the Bank Bill yesterday. For the most part, it seemed as if there was opposition from the conservative of the equation on the bill.

Primary Season is beginning to wind down this month with only a handful of states to go before the voters go to the polls in the General Election this November, and already we've seen a few big names fall out within their own party. One thing that has become apparent through this election season is the simple idea that "Politics is local," and a few groups have cashed out on that idea already.

So, now that were just a few months out, how does everyone in Yahoo! Answers Politics feel about their Midterm Elections this year?

We've had the Tea Party out in the ranks since last summer, and the big names in the Republican Party have been making their rounds in the districts. Meanwhile, President Obama sent out his message this weekend to get his voters from 2008 to go out and stand behind the Democratic candidates in the upcoming election.

Past all of the headlines, I always wonder what the voting collective thinks about the Election.

So, how do you feel about the Midterms so far?

Now that Health Care is a done deal, what issue will the Obama Admin concentrate on next?

I know... This question sounds kind of obvious, but I was wondering if it created jobs for those looking into their respective Civil Service Commission. If so, will it be broad-based or narrowed down specifically to the health care field?

How does the Health Care Bill affect smokers in the nation? Can we go back to smoking on the planes again since everyone will be required to have some sort of health insurance in the nation?

Would such a game steal thunder from CapitalOne?

Politico has a story out today about the Democrats ending the idea of Superdelegates within the Democratic Party.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/31074.ht...

So, is this a step forward for the party, or a step backward? Would the measure ever pass in the DNC Rules Committee?