Donaldo P

the concept that time stops when you travel at the speed of light is something Iv'e never agreed with. but, what if light was instant and because you can't travel faster than time, because then time must go backwards, perhaps light travels at the speed of time. I belive this makes more sense than the idea of not being able to travel at the speed of light. it's just like traveling along the motorway at 60mph, you drive next to another car traveling at 60mph, the car seems to be still. time must have a speed if the universe is expanding, but if all this is true the universe must be expanding at the speed of time (speed of light).

Which system do you use for songwriting, give pros and cons!

Aha! been off Answers for a while, but I'm back now after a session of thinking and a good bottle of red wine.

This new thought ( which I hope most of you will find very interesting), Is about binaural beats and those who think with the right hemisphere of the brain (me Included) and those of the left. I tend to keep a very open mind on both hemispheres and try to combine them (as I'm doing now). For those who have no Idea of binaural beats, It's basicacly a way of using frequencies to alter the state of consiousness (like meditation) now If meditiation was made many years before research, then what I'm putting out is that theese people were more intact with their body and mind, according to biarual beats. So this proves that those before science knew more than science itself knows now, but It can also mean that sceince is proving religion wrong again (Don't get me wrong, I am a zen budhist)

so what I'm asking is for more opinions of this connection!

what is true?

meditate on this one before you answer.

If you are someone searching for this, you may have to ask yourself what is it your'e actually looking for, I'm not looking for "true" as stated in the dictionary, what is your "true". you have to take into account that what's true for one isn't true for another, and true can't be an opinion. I have been wondering about this for a while, and "true" doesn't seem to exist. sure there's truth, but that's not the same thing, It's a personal aspect of true, I'm wondering about a universal "true". what I'm asking realy is, is destroying a question the only way to solve it?