bombom77

...why did Obama vote against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions.

[At the end of the hearing, according to the official records of the Illinois State senate, Obama thanked Stanek for being “very clear and forthright,” but said his concern was that Stanek had suggested “doctors really don’t care about children who are being born with a reasonable prospect of life because they are so locked into their pro-abortion views that they would watch an infant that is viable die.” He told her, “That may be your assessment, and I don’t see any evidence of that. What we are doing here is to create one more burden on a woman and I can’t support that.”]

Does this mean a woman can kill her children because they create a burdren on her? I am just curious.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18647

If Jesse Jackson really wants to take away Obama's jewels who is going to do the surgery?

Only 21% of voters support federal help for those facing forclosure. The Senate is working on passing a bill that provides a 300 billion bailout for people facing forclosure. Who else (besides me) is pissed off about this. Those of us who live within our means and save our money get to help bail out people who overspend and get into debt.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/bus...

They contain mercury requiring major decontamination if they break. They cost a bundle. They do not work well when cold. Don't work on a dimmer switch. They are not as bright as thier counterparts. Why am I supposed to buy this product again?