Tim

I asked why the feminists "feel unsafe" about having a men's rights group recognized on college campus?

This was BadaBoom's answer:

"Why don't you add white history month to your desired groups? Men have ruled over the world for centuries, they are not the ones that need a right advocacy group."

That's gross ignorance:

Men have faced unjust discrimination in a number of areas; for one; the MILITARY DRAFT! being forced to die in combat on a foreign land is no big deal, right?

and criminal punishment; in years past sometimes women have been known to get lighter sentences via gender bias.

Women think if they hit a man, and a man hits her back.....somehow the man is more likely to get ARRESTED!?

Men charged higher premiums for auto and life insurance ---- yeah I know there are reasons for that, but same could be said for charging women higher premiums in health care, which was OUTLAWED.

for years women have lived longer than men, women's health issues have received a lot more attention than men's.....

where's all the prostate cancer awareness parades?

and men should get equal child custody rights!

for years women have expected men to do most of the WORK - employment wise.

I'm not denying that raising kids is work.....

but there's something about having to drive out in snowy conditions to an office,

and having a supervisor breathing down your neck,

that makes life a little more stressful and unpleasant.

Bada boom's statement was gross ignorance.

If not, why do so many of your colleagues have a problem with it?

http://theeyeopener.com/2016/01/mens-issues-group-...

the burden is on the accused to prove there was verbal consent.

otherwise he's guilty.

That's how it works statewide in California on college campuses.

No, they don't put in the in prison.

but they do expel them from college.

based on a "guilty until proven innocent" standard.

Are you aware of this? do you agree with this outrageous policy?

the accused should have to prove there was verbal consent............otherwise he's guilty?

I'm 22 years old and I have a net worth over 100k.

Why?

because when I was 18, I DIDN'T go to college.

I took what would have been my college fund and invested it into the stock market.

and I got a full-time job,

lived with my parents for four years,

and saved up from that.

look at me: no degree and 100k in my name.

or:

would you rather be thousands of dollars in debt with a degree?

you realize that degree doesn't lead to a job offer, right?

I got a job straight out of high school making 20k/year.....

I invested what would have been my college fund into the stock market.....

I lived with my parents for four years,

allowing me to save up more funds...and today at age 22 (when my peers are just finishing college) I have a net worth close to 100k.

Meanwhile my peers are thousands of dollars in debt..............

and contrary to popular myth,

they're getting jobs that pay about 20k/year also.

I got a job straight out of high school making 20k/year.....

I lived with my parents for four years,

invested all my funds in stocks and today at age 22 (when my peers are just finishing college) I have a net worth close to 100k.

Meanwhile my peers are thousands of dollars in debt..............

and contrary to popular myth,

they're getting jobs that pay about 20k/year also.

by realizing college is a scam,

get a job straight out of high school,

live with your parents instead of a college dorm....

spend four years saving up money instead of accumulating debt,

congratulations, you've earned a degree in finance without ever stepping foot inside a school.

While you have achieved five-digit (or maybe even six-digit) net worth,

most of your peers will have thousands of dollars in student loan debt.....

and will be working at a job that doesn't require a degree anyway.

Get my point?

think I'm off-base here?

no, I'm not.