Archer

I'm sure that this has been questioned a lot

But can someone explain or counter these remarks in an objective way.

1- Knowing that Animals developed counter measures and 'evolved' defenses against other animals which are higher on the food pyramid, why haven't the animals developed counter measures against humans yet

2- Without humans, the balance of nature was right, now it is not, doesn't that mean that animals are far more evolved than humans

3- If humanity evolved, what purpose does the human race live for, and wouldn't the humanity be a civilization by now if they are far too evolved than other species.

4- Why do humans with power tend to collect resources that they do not need putting limits and boundaries against the ones who need, while less evolved species in general tend to take exactly their need

5- Why hasn't the human race evolved into Dual reproductive organs ( Hermaphrodite ) where the person can be both genders. This would have solved LGBT problems and places with dominating race problems

Or reproductive ways like Bacteria not needing a mate, better teams can be formed

6- Why haven't people 'evolved' wings yet.. And don't tell me planes can replace having real wings

7- Why do people need to spend time and effort developing their bodily features and skills, where less evolved species have it with their genes

8- Why is the 'evolved' human race ruled by individuals showing very low genetic quality

Debate for fun.. No-one is omniscient.. so far