David K

Recently I got in a pi$$ing match with a contributer who's answer was condecending to the asker, but worse, wrong and borderline dangerous. That begs the question... 'How do you as the inquisitors want wrong and dangerous answers handled'? Opining is fine- "I like Dunlop"... "I like Metzler" but when info that is offered as fact... and by someone representing themselves as an expert, is wrong or dangerous to life or bike... what do you want. Do you want the poser called out or do you want to wade throught conflicting and often opposing answers. When answers can destroy property or endanger life, one would think there is a moral imperative here.

I ride with five other guys every year for a couple of weeks (August/September). This year we would like to do New Brunswick, Nova Scotia (coming up through Maine) and returning through eastern Canada to Quebec City where we will head back south to Augusta, Maine. We like scenic country and curvey roads... don't like interstates or heavy trucked roads. Oh.. and anything to worry about with loud pipes or other modifications to a bike??? Thanks (Merci)