If there was a news, and both of them reported something, who do you believe? You have to decide on only one. You have no prior knowledge on the news. You don't know any of them personally.
The blogger might be inexperienced, but writes from his experience and is honest. The reporter might be biased (politically), but reports after research and is experienced.
bptoche1
Favorite Answer
Neither, everyone knows that all news everywhere is fake. The 2004 Presidential elections, never happened. Sure it was all over the "news" but seriously has anyone ever even seen this "President" I hear so much about?
Anonymous
Depends on the blog. I'm always a skeptic with a new blog. If they provide daily entries with quality information, I would go with the blogger if I had to choose only one.
n00b
blogger
1) they're not biased (politically)
2) they tend to be more interesting (as in cuss words and taboo)