Most boring World Cup in a history of football; Your ideas about how to save a football?
Even FIFA president Blatter is now worried that this World cup is one of the worst n the history from spectators point of view.
http://sports.yahoo.com/sow/news?slug=ap-wcup-lowscoringrecord&prov=ap&type=lgns
Teams can not score anymore and mostly play defending boring football, matches aren't fun to watch any more, and if there will be no goals scored in both remaining games the goal efficiency will be lowest ever in the tournament history. They now discussing an idea of increasing a size of the goal, or reducing number of players on the field to ten man instead of eleven, so the football can become attractive and entertaining sport again.
Any of you have ideas about how to save football?
Banning Portugal and Italy from playing is a nice joke of course, but I am serious..
If offside trap will be eliminated it can paradoxally make game even more defending. Thing is that in that case strikers will be allowed to take positions as close as they want to the opponents goals whole game long and then eventually team would keep even more defenders back to control those strikers..
I think tournament strukture should be changed. Look at the Champions league or Premiership game-there are plenty of goals scored and most games are very dramatic. So it is not a fabrique of the game it is something about the way the tournament rooster is set.
Could be they should allow to bring more the 23 players in the tournament so team scan rotate more players after some will be exhausted. And note: group stage was more exiting when a play off games,because players been less paranoid about losing a goal. May be they should set a second stage as a group stage as well like it was in 1970-s or in 1982 Spain?
I think Spain 1982 with 6 groups at first stage and four 3 team groups on second was a best model.
And reducing number of teams back to 24 would be good idea too, so spoilers who just coming to hung out like Saudi Arabia Angola would not waste fun's time.
NOTE: If you have any answer to the question please go ahead, but if you you hands itching to write something "Are you crazy!?This is most exiting WC ever!Christiano Ronaldo is CUUUTE!" please find some other thread ok?
SHOT CLOCK:I was thinking about it too but is you watch the games closely that would work against attacking teams actually. The nastiest defensive strategy most teams use here at this WC is actually to group the whole team back, let opponent play the ball, tackle everyone close to the box, and either wait for penalty shoot out or someone like Ronaldo to dive and win the penalty. France was able to break the lock though in most of her games,and Irespect them for it,but itdoesnot makea whole thing more exiting
So shot clock would actually punish an attacking team who would be limited in their chances to set a nice combination.
Colin have you actually noticed that in most 0-0 games teams actually Loved to keep the ball at their own half?It was happening because the opponent would usually have the whole team in defence and going forward meant risk of losing the ballandfasing counterattack while passing it between own defenders,or back to the goalie could go on sfaely for ages ensuring the safe passage to the penalty shoot out.
I don't know why asshoelteams like Germany or Portugal love he penalty shoot out somuchbut tagging along for two hoursnotplaying themselvesandnot alowwing opponent to play seems their major strategy.
If we will get rid of penalty shoot out option then could be those teams would be actually forced to play football..
Francis and Wood At you both are reported for personal attacks, and xenophobic remarks about whole nation (Georgia) which has nothing to do with discussion.
Francis is also reported for misinforming the yahoo about content of my posts-I have not written anything about either USA or Germany as far as i remember.